Discrimination of Breast Cancer from Healthy Breast Tissue Using a Three-component Diffusion-weighted MRI Model
©2020 American Association for Cancer Research..
PURPOSE: Diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) is a contrast-free modality that has demonstrated ability to discriminate between predefined benign and malignant breast lesions. However, how well DW-MRI discriminates cancer from all other breast tissue voxels in a clinical setting is unknown. Here we explore the voxelwise ability to distinguish cancer from healthy breast tissue using signal contributions from the newly developed three-component multi-b-value DW-MRI model.
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with pathology-proven breast cancer from two datasets (n = 81 and n = 25) underwent multi-b-value DW-MRI. The three-component signal contributions C 1 and C 2 and their product, C 1 C 2, and signal fractions F 1, F 2, and F 1 F 2 were compared with the image defined on maximum b-value (DWI max), conventional apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and apparent diffusion kurtosis (K app). The ability to discriminate between cancer and healthy breast tissue was assessed by the false-positive rate given a sensitivity of 80% (FPR80) and ROC AUC.
RESULTS: Mean FPR80 for both datasets was 0.016 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.008-0.024] for C 1 C 2, 0.136 (95% CI, 0.092-0.180) for C 1, 0.068 (95% CI, 0.049-0.087) for C 2, 0.462 (95% CI, 0.425-0.499) for F 1 F 2, 0.832 (95% CI, 0.797-0.868) for F 1, 0.176 (95% CI, 0.150-0.203) for F 2, 0.159 (95% CI, 0.114-0.204) for DWI max, 0.731 (95% CI, 0.692-0.770) for ADC, and 0.684 (95% CI, 0.660-0.709) for K app. Mean ROC AUC for C 1 C 2 was 0.984 (95% CI, 0.977-0.991).
CONCLUSIONS: The C 1 C 2 parameter of the three-component model yields a clinically useful discrimination between cancer and healthy breast tissue, superior to other DW-MRI methods and obliviating predefining lesions. This novel DW-MRI method may serve as noncontrast alternative to standard-of-care dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2021 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2021 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:27 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research - 27(2021), 4 vom: 15. Feb., Seite 1094-1104 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Andreassen, Maren M Sjaastad [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
Comparative Study |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 20.01.2022 Date Revised 02.04.2024 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-2017 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM317168843 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM317168843 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240402232359.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231225s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-2017 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1360.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM317168843 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)33148675 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Andreassen, Maren M Sjaastad |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Discrimination of Breast Cancer from Healthy Breast Tissue Using a Three-component Diffusion-weighted MRI Model |
264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 20.01.2022 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 02.04.2024 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a ©2020 American Association for Cancer Research. | ||
520 | |a PURPOSE: Diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) is a contrast-free modality that has demonstrated ability to discriminate between predefined benign and malignant breast lesions. However, how well DW-MRI discriminates cancer from all other breast tissue voxels in a clinical setting is unknown. Here we explore the voxelwise ability to distinguish cancer from healthy breast tissue using signal contributions from the newly developed three-component multi-b-value DW-MRI model | ||
520 | |a EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with pathology-proven breast cancer from two datasets (n = 81 and n = 25) underwent multi-b-value DW-MRI. The three-component signal contributions C 1 and C 2 and their product, C 1 C 2, and signal fractions F 1, F 2, and F 1 F 2 were compared with the image defined on maximum b-value (DWI max), conventional apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and apparent diffusion kurtosis (K app). The ability to discriminate between cancer and healthy breast tissue was assessed by the false-positive rate given a sensitivity of 80% (FPR80) and ROC AUC | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: Mean FPR80 for both datasets was 0.016 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.008-0.024] for C 1 C 2, 0.136 (95% CI, 0.092-0.180) for C 1, 0.068 (95% CI, 0.049-0.087) for C 2, 0.462 (95% CI, 0.425-0.499) for F 1 F 2, 0.832 (95% CI, 0.797-0.868) for F 1, 0.176 (95% CI, 0.150-0.203) for F 2, 0.159 (95% CI, 0.114-0.204) for DWI max, 0.731 (95% CI, 0.692-0.770) for ADC, and 0.684 (95% CI, 0.660-0.709) for K app. Mean ROC AUC for C 1 C 2 was 0.984 (95% CI, 0.977-0.991) | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: The C 1 C 2 parameter of the three-component model yields a clinically useful discrimination between cancer and healthy breast tissue, superior to other DW-MRI methods and obliviating predefining lesions. This novel DW-MRI method may serve as noncontrast alternative to standard-of-care dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI | ||
650 | 4 | |a Comparative Study | |
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Observational Study | |
650 | 4 | |a Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural | |
650 | 4 | |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't | |
700 | 1 | |a Rodríguez-Soto, Ana E |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Conlin, Christopher C |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Vidić, Igor |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Seibert, Tyler M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Wallace, Anne M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Zare, Somaye |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Kuperman, Joshua |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Abudu, Boya |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Ahn, Grace S |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Hahn, Michael |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Jerome, Neil P |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Østlie, Agnes |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Bathen, Tone F |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Ojeda-Fournier, Haydee |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Goa, Pål Erik |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Rakow-Penner, Rebecca |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Dale, Anders M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research |d 1995 |g 27(2021), 4 vom: 15. Feb., Seite 1094-1104 |w (DE-627)NLM09444479X |x 1557-3265 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:27 |g year:2021 |g number:4 |g day:15 |g month:02 |g pages:1094-1104 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-2017 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 27 |j 2021 |e 4 |b 15 |c 02 |h 1094-1104 |