Real-Time Debriefing After Critical Events : Exploring the Gap Between Principle and Reality
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved..
Debriefing after perioperative crises (eg, cardiac arrest, massive hemorrhage) is a well-described practice that can provide benefits to individuals, teams, and health systems. Debriefing has also been embraced by high-stakes industries outside of health care. Yet, in studies of actual clinical practice, there are many critical events that do not get debriefed. This article explores the gap that exists between principle and reality and the factors and strategies to offer opportunities to reflect on actual critical events, when indicated, across the increasing scope of environments where anesthesia care is provided.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2020 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2020 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:38 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Anesthesiology clinics - 38(2020), 4 vom: 01. Dez., Seite 801-820 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Arriaga, Alexander F [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
Crew/crisis resource management |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 04.11.2021 Date Revised 29.03.2024 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1016/j.anclin.2020.08.003 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM316955221 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM316955221 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240330000007.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231225s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.anclin.2020.08.003 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1355.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM316955221 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)33127029 | ||
035 | |a (PII)S1932-2275(20)30066-5 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Arriaga, Alexander F |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Real-Time Debriefing After Critical Events |b Exploring the Gap Between Principle and Reality |
264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 04.11.2021 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 29.03.2024 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. | ||
520 | |a Debriefing after perioperative crises (eg, cardiac arrest, massive hemorrhage) is a well-described practice that can provide benefits to individuals, teams, and health systems. Debriefing has also been embraced by high-stakes industries outside of health care. Yet, in studies of actual clinical practice, there are many critical events that do not get debriefed. This article explores the gap that exists between principle and reality and the factors and strategies to offer opportunities to reflect on actual critical events, when indicated, across the increasing scope of environments where anesthesia care is provided | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Review | |
650 | 4 | |a Crew/crisis resource management | |
650 | 4 | |a Critical event debriefing | |
650 | 4 | |a Debriefing | |
650 | 4 | |a Feedback | |
650 | 4 | |a Implementation science | |
650 | 4 | |a Medical education | |
650 | 4 | |a Medical simulation | |
650 | 4 | |a Patient safety | |
700 | 1 | |a Szyld, Demian |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Pian-Smith, May C M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Anesthesiology clinics |d 2006 |g 38(2020), 4 vom: 01. Dez., Seite 801-820 |w (DE-627)NLM160807263 |x 1932-2275 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:38 |g year:2020 |g number:4 |g day:01 |g month:12 |g pages:801-820 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anclin.2020.08.003 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 38 |j 2020 |e 4 |b 01 |c 12 |h 801-820 |