The Birkenhead drill suggests 'women and children first' : government and society's reversal of the drill during the COVID-19 pandemic, left children last and cannot be allowed to continue
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ..
The Birkenhead drill states that in the time of crisis, the correct action is to prioritise the weakest and most vulnerable, in that example, women and children. Ethically this has been well analysed in terms of the intrinsic value of the human versus any utilitarian calculus of worth to society's function. We do not attempt to re-analyse this but do note that standard pandemic planning often disadvantages the weak and vulnerable in terms of allocation of resources to those with a greater chance of functional survival. We more argue from a debt that society owes its children in terms of the sacrifices they have made in terms of school, social life, healthcare and overall welfare during the pandemic from which they were at markedly less risk than adults. Society owes a debt to its young, and this on top of pre-existing commitments to the them that most nations fail to realise, calls for prioritisation of children and young people's issues as society rebuilds. The effects of poverty and systemic racism on many children must be tackled; so too the existential threats of climate change and pollution. COVID-19 provides a once in a generation opportunity to create a kinder, fairer society. Early signs are not good: Pub re-opening prioritised over school re-opening; no significant investment in children's services or women's health, a significant determinant of children's welfare. We highlight the way COVID-19 has, and continues, to harm children and argue that the contemporary erosion of the Birkenhead principle is simply amoral.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2021 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2021 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:97 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Postgraduate medical journal - 97(2021), 1144 vom: 17. Feb., Seite 119-122 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Brierley, Joe [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Ethics (see Medical Ethics) |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 04.02.2021 Date Revised 24.05.2023 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1136/postgradmedj-2020-137991 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM316395471 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM316395471 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231225161005.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231225s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1136/postgradmedj-2020-137991 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1054.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM316395471 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)33070115 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Brierley, Joe |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The Birkenhead drill suggests 'women and children first' |b government and society's reversal of the drill during the COVID-19 pandemic, left children last and cannot be allowed to continue |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 04.02.2021 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 24.05.2023 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. | ||
| 520 | |a The Birkenhead drill states that in the time of crisis, the correct action is to prioritise the weakest and most vulnerable, in that example, women and children. Ethically this has been well analysed in terms of the intrinsic value of the human versus any utilitarian calculus of worth to society's function. We do not attempt to re-analyse this but do note that standard pandemic planning often disadvantages the weak and vulnerable in terms of allocation of resources to those with a greater chance of functional survival. We more argue from a debt that society owes its children in terms of the sacrifices they have made in terms of school, social life, healthcare and overall welfare during the pandemic from which they were at markedly less risk than adults. Society owes a debt to its young, and this on top of pre-existing commitments to the them that most nations fail to realise, calls for prioritisation of children and young people's issues as society rebuilds. The effects of poverty and systemic racism on many children must be tackled; so too the existential threats of climate change and pollution. COVID-19 provides a once in a generation opportunity to create a kinder, fairer society. Early signs are not good: Pub re-opening prioritised over school re-opening; no significant investment in children's services or women's health, a significant determinant of children's welfare. We highlight the way COVID-19 has, and continues, to harm children and argue that the contemporary erosion of the Birkenhead principle is simply amoral | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Ethics (see Medical Ethics) | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Health policy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Health services administration & management | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Paediatrics | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Larcher, Vic |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Postgraduate medical journal |d 1925 |g 97(2021), 1144 vom: 17. Feb., Seite 119-122 |w (DE-627)NLM000043753 |x 1469-0756 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:97 |g year:2021 |g number:1144 |g day:17 |g month:02 |g pages:119-122 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2020-137991 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 97 |j 2021 |e 1144 |b 17 |c 02 |h 119-122 | ||