Association between patient-physician gender concordance and patient experience scores. Is there gender bias?
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc..
BACKGROUND: Patient satisfaction, a commonly measured indicator of quality of care and patient experience, is often used in physician performance reviews and promotion decisions. Patient satisfaction surveys may introduce gender-related bias.
OBJECTIVE: Examine the effect of patient and physician gender concordance on patient satisfaction with emergency care.
METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of electronic health record and Press Ganey patient satisfaction survey data of adult patients discharged from the emergency department (2015-2018). Logistic regression models were used to examine relationships between physician gender, patient gender, and physician-patient gender dyads. Binary outcomes included: perfect care provider score and perfect overall assessment score.
RESULTS: Female patients returned surveys more often (n=7 612; 61.55%) and accounted for more visits (n=232 024; 55.26%). Female patients had lower odds of perfect scores for provider score and overall assessment score (OR: 0.852, 95% CI: 0.790, 0.918; OR: 0.782, 95% CI: 0.723, 0.846). Female physicians had 1.102 (95% CI: 1.001, 1.213) times the odds of receiving a perfect provider score. Physician gender did not influence male patients' odds of reporting a perfect care provider score (95% CI: 0.916, 1.158) whereas female patients treated by female physicians had 1.146 times the odds (95% CI: 1.019, 1.289) of a perfect provider score.
CONCLUSION: Female patients prefer female emergency physicians but were less satisfied with their physician and emergency department visit overall. Over-representation of female patients on patient satisfaction surveys introduces bias. Patient satisfaction surveys should be deemphasized from physician compensation and promotion decisions.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2021 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2021 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:45 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
The American journal of emergency medicine - 45(2021) vom: 16. Juli, Seite 476-482 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Chekijian, Sharon [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
Emergency Medicine |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 26.08.2021 Date Revised 26.08.2021 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1016/j.ajem.2020.09.090 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM316389757 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM316389757 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231225160957.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231225s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.09.090 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1054.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM316389757 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)33069544 | ||
035 | |a (PII)S0735-6757(20)30895-0 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Chekijian, Sharon |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Association between patient-physician gender concordance and patient experience scores. Is there gender bias? |
264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 26.08.2021 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 26.08.2021 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc. | ||
520 | |a BACKGROUND: Patient satisfaction, a commonly measured indicator of quality of care and patient experience, is often used in physician performance reviews and promotion decisions. Patient satisfaction surveys may introduce gender-related bias | ||
520 | |a OBJECTIVE: Examine the effect of patient and physician gender concordance on patient satisfaction with emergency care | ||
520 | |a METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of electronic health record and Press Ganey patient satisfaction survey data of adult patients discharged from the emergency department (2015-2018). Logistic regression models were used to examine relationships between physician gender, patient gender, and physician-patient gender dyads. Binary outcomes included: perfect care provider score and perfect overall assessment score | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: Female patients returned surveys more often (n=7 612; 61.55%) and accounted for more visits (n=232 024; 55.26%). Female patients had lower odds of perfect scores for provider score and overall assessment score (OR: 0.852, 95% CI: 0.790, 0.918; OR: 0.782, 95% CI: 0.723, 0.846). Female physicians had 1.102 (95% CI: 1.001, 1.213) times the odds of receiving a perfect provider score. Physician gender did not influence male patients' odds of reporting a perfect care provider score (95% CI: 0.916, 1.158) whereas female patients treated by female physicians had 1.146 times the odds (95% CI: 1.019, 1.289) of a perfect provider score | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSION: Female patients prefer female emergency physicians but were less satisfied with their physician and emergency department visit overall. Over-representation of female patients on patient satisfaction surveys introduces bias. Patient satisfaction surveys should be deemphasized from physician compensation and promotion decisions | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Multicenter Study | |
650 | 4 | |a Emergency Medicine | |
650 | 4 | |a Gender Concordance | |
650 | 4 | |a Operations | |
650 | 4 | |a Patient Experience | |
650 | 4 | |a Patient Satisfaction | |
650 | 4 | |a Sex and Gender | |
700 | 1 | |a Kinsman, Jeremiah |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Taylor, R Andrew |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Ravi, Shashank |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Parwani, Vivek |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Ulrich, Andrew |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Venkatesh, Arjun |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Agrawal, Pooja |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t The American journal of emergency medicine |d 1986 |g 45(2021) vom: 16. Juli, Seite 476-482 |w (DE-627)NLM01297868X |x 1532-8171 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:45 |g year:2021 |g day:16 |g month:07 |g pages:476-482 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2020.09.090 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 45 |j 2021 |b 16 |c 07 |h 476-482 |