Early Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence in the Posttransplant Population : A Comparison of RETREAT and Cleveland Clinic Florida Scoring System
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved..
BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is curative in most cases; however, recurrence is observed in some patients. The Risk Estimation of Tumor Recurrence After Transplant (RETREAT) score is an externally validated scoring system for prediction of post-LT HCC recurrence. The Cleveland Clinic Florida Scoring System (CCFSS) is a potential new scoring system for prediction of HCC recurrence. Our study aimed to compare the RETREAT and CCFSS.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 52 adult patients with HCC who underwent LT at a tertiary care center. Mantel-Haenszel chi-square analyses were conducted to compare the RETREAT and CCFSS classifications for detecting HCC recurrence.
RESULTS: A total of 52 patients underwent LT. The median follow-up period was 37 months. Four patients had post-LT HCC recurrence, with all recurrences occurring within 2 years of LT. The RETREAT score was better able to detect low, moderate, and high levels of risk (P < .001), compared to the CCFSS score (P = 0.480). Both risk scores had a sensitivity of 75%; the specificity of the RETREAT score was 95.8%, whereas the specificity of the CCFSS was 60.4%. Alpha-fetoprotein level at the time of LT was associated with HCC recurrence (P = .014).
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to evaluate the CCFSS as a potential new scoring system to predict HCC recurrence after LT. The RETREAT score is more specific than the CCFSS. The incorporation of alpha-fetoprotein level at the time of LT improves the estimation of HCC recurrence in the post-LT period.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2021 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2021 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:53 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Transplantation proceedings - 53(2021), 1 vom: 20. Jan., Seite 193-199 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Hasan, Badar [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 19.04.2021 Date Revised 19.04.2021 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1016/j.transproceed.2020.09.015 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM316389218 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM316389218 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231225160957.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231225s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.transproceed.2020.09.015 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1054.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM316389218 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)33069486 | ||
035 | |a (PII)S0041-1345(20)32746-9 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Hasan, Badar |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Early Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence in the Posttransplant Population |b A Comparison of RETREAT and Cleveland Clinic Florida Scoring System |
264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 19.04.2021 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 19.04.2021 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. | ||
520 | |a BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is curative in most cases; however, recurrence is observed in some patients. The Risk Estimation of Tumor Recurrence After Transplant (RETREAT) score is an externally validated scoring system for prediction of post-LT HCC recurrence. The Cleveland Clinic Florida Scoring System (CCFSS) is a potential new scoring system for prediction of HCC recurrence. Our study aimed to compare the RETREAT and CCFSS | ||
520 | |a METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 52 adult patients with HCC who underwent LT at a tertiary care center. Mantel-Haenszel chi-square analyses were conducted to compare the RETREAT and CCFSS classifications for detecting HCC recurrence | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: A total of 52 patients underwent LT. The median follow-up period was 37 months. Four patients had post-LT HCC recurrence, with all recurrences occurring within 2 years of LT. The RETREAT score was better able to detect low, moderate, and high levels of risk (P < .001), compared to the CCFSS score (P = 0.480). Both risk scores had a sensitivity of 75%; the specificity of the RETREAT score was 95.8%, whereas the specificity of the CCFSS was 60.4%. Alpha-fetoprotein level at the time of LT was associated with HCC recurrence (P = .014) | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to evaluate the CCFSS as a potential new scoring system to predict HCC recurrence after LT. The RETREAT score is more specific than the CCFSS. The incorporation of alpha-fetoprotein level at the time of LT improves the estimation of HCC recurrence in the post-LT period | ||
650 | 4 | |a Comparative Study | |
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 7 | |a alpha-Fetoproteins |2 NLM | |
700 | 1 | |a Colak, Yasar |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Khalid, Rumman A |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Castillo, Michael |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Castaneda, Daniel |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Tandon, Kanwarpreet |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Shaw, Joshua J |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Erim, Tolga |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Zervos, Xaralambos B |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Castro, Fernando J |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Al-Khalloufi, Kawtar |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Transplantation proceedings |d 1969 |g 53(2021), 1 vom: 20. Jan., Seite 193-199 |w (DE-627)NLM000011029 |x 1873-2623 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:53 |g year:2021 |g number:1 |g day:20 |g month:01 |g pages:193-199 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2020.09.015 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 53 |j 2021 |e 1 |b 20 |c 01 |h 193-199 |