A survey of current trends in root canal treatment : access cavity design and cleaning and shaping practices
© 2020 Australian Society of Endodontology Inc..
The purpose of this study was to evaluate current trends in access cavity design and cleaning and shaping among endodontists. A survey was e-mailed to active members of the American Association of Endodontists. Data showed that most respondents used traditional (57%) or conservative (43%) access cavities; less than 1% reported using ultraconservative access cavities. A glide path was created by 93% of respondents; NaOCl was used as lubricant by 51% of respondents, while 28% used RC Prep, 9% used liquid EDTA, 7% used Glyde, and 2% did not use any lubricant. Most respondents used NaOCl at 5.25% or higher concentration. Smear layer was removed by 92% of endodontists. Apical gauging was mostly accomplished with hand files. Clinical preferences varied among surveyed endodontists and among different age groups. Currently, very few endodontists use ultraconservative access preparations. There was large variation among the respondents suggesting a possible need for quality guidelines.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2021 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2021 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:47 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Australian endodontic journal : the journal of the Australian Society of Endodontology Inc - 47(2021), 1 vom: 04. Apr., Seite 27-33 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Tsotsis, Polymnia [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
9G34HU7RV0 |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 06.04.2021 Date Revised 06.04.2021 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1111/aej.12449 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM316003786 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM316003786 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231225160134.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231225s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/aej.12449 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1053.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM316003786 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)33030288 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Tsotsis, Polymnia |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 2 | |a A survey of current trends in root canal treatment |b access cavity design and cleaning and shaping practices |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 06.04.2021 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 06.04.2021 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a © 2020 Australian Society of Endodontology Inc. | ||
| 520 | |a The purpose of this study was to evaluate current trends in access cavity design and cleaning and shaping among endodontists. A survey was e-mailed to active members of the American Association of Endodontists. Data showed that most respondents used traditional (57%) or conservative (43%) access cavities; less than 1% reported using ultraconservative access cavities. A glide path was created by 93% of respondents; NaOCl was used as lubricant by 51% of respondents, while 28% used RC Prep, 9% used liquid EDTA, 7% used Glyde, and 2% did not use any lubricant. Most respondents used NaOCl at 5.25% or higher concentration. Smear layer was removed by 92% of endodontists. Apical gauging was mostly accomplished with hand files. Clinical preferences varied among surveyed endodontists and among different age groups. Currently, very few endodontists use ultraconservative access preparations. There was large variation among the respondents suggesting a possible need for quality guidelines | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a apical gauging | |
| 650 | 4 | |a endodontic access | |
| 650 | 4 | |a irrigation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a smear layer | |
| 650 | 4 | |a survey | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Root Canal Irrigants |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Edetic Acid |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a 9G34HU7RV0 |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Sodium Hypochlorite |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a DY38VHM5OD |2 NLM | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Dunlap, Craig |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Scott, Raymond |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Arias, Ana |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Peters, Ove A |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Australian endodontic journal : the journal of the Australian Society of Endodontology Inc |d 1998 |g 47(2021), 1 vom: 04. Apr., Seite 27-33 |w (DE-627)NLM112652816 |x 1747-4477 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:47 |g year:2021 |g number:1 |g day:04 |g month:04 |g pages:27-33 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aej.12449 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 47 |j 2021 |e 1 |b 04 |c 04 |h 27-33 | ||