Are Gadolinium-Enhanced MR Sequences Needed in Simultaneous 18F-FDG-PET/MRI for Tumor Delineation in Head and Neck Cancer?
© 2020 by American Journal of Neuroradiology..
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: PET/MRI with 18F-FDG has demonstrated the advantages of simultaneous PET and MR imaging in head and neck cancer imaging, MRI allowing excellent soft-tissue contrast, while PET provides metabolic information. The aim of this study was to evaluate the added value of gadolinium contrast-enhanced sequences in the tumor delineation of head and neck cancers on 18F-FDG-PET/MR imaging.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent simultaneous head and neck 18F-FDG-PET/MR imaging staging or restaging followed by surgery were retrospectively included. Local tumor invasion and lymph node extension were assessed in 45 head and neck anatomic regions using 18F-FDG-PET/MR imaging by 2 rater groups (each one including a radiologist and a nuclear medicine physician). Two reading sessions were performed, one without contrast-enhanced sequences (using only T1WI, T2WI, and PET images) and a second with additional T1WI postcontrast sequences. The results were compared with the detailed histopathologic analysis, used as reference standard. The κ concordance coefficient between the reading sessions and sensitivity and specificity for each region were calculated.
RESULTS: Thirty patients were included. There was excellent agreement between the contrast-free and postgadolinium reading sessions in delineating precise tumor extension in the 45 anatomic regions studied (Cohen κ = 0.96, 95% CI = [0.94-0.97], P < .001). The diagnostic accuracy did not differ between contrast-free and postgadolinium reading sessions, being 0.97 for both groups and both reading sessions. For the 2 rater groups, there was good sensitivity for both contrast-free (0.83 and 0.85) and postgadolinium reading sessions (0.88 and 0.90, respectively). Moreover, there was excellent specificity (0.98) for both groups and reading sessions.
CONCLUSIONS: Gadolinium chelate contrast administration showed no added value for accurate characterization of head and neck primary tumor extension and could possibly be avoided in the PET/MR imaging head and neck workflow.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2020 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2020 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:41 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology - 41(2020), 10 vom: 24. Okt., Seite 1888-1896 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Pyatigorskaya, N [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
0Z5B2CJX4D |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 08.02.2021 Date Revised 16.07.2022 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.3174/ajnr.A6764 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM315437596 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM315437596 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231225154920.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231225s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.3174/ajnr.A6764 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1051.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM315437596 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)32972956 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Pyatigorskaya, N |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Are Gadolinium-Enhanced MR Sequences Needed in Simultaneous 18F-FDG-PET/MRI for Tumor Delineation in Head and Neck Cancer? |
264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 08.02.2021 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 16.07.2022 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a © 2020 by American Journal of Neuroradiology. | ||
520 | |a BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: PET/MRI with 18F-FDG has demonstrated the advantages of simultaneous PET and MR imaging in head and neck cancer imaging, MRI allowing excellent soft-tissue contrast, while PET provides metabolic information. The aim of this study was to evaluate the added value of gadolinium contrast-enhanced sequences in the tumor delineation of head and neck cancers on 18F-FDG-PET/MR imaging | ||
520 | |a MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent simultaneous head and neck 18F-FDG-PET/MR imaging staging or restaging followed by surgery were retrospectively included. Local tumor invasion and lymph node extension were assessed in 45 head and neck anatomic regions using 18F-FDG-PET/MR imaging by 2 rater groups (each one including a radiologist and a nuclear medicine physician). Two reading sessions were performed, one without contrast-enhanced sequences (using only T1WI, T2WI, and PET images) and a second with additional T1WI postcontrast sequences. The results were compared with the detailed histopathologic analysis, used as reference standard. The κ concordance coefficient between the reading sessions and sensitivity and specificity for each region were calculated | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: Thirty patients were included. There was excellent agreement between the contrast-free and postgadolinium reading sessions in delineating precise tumor extension in the 45 anatomic regions studied (Cohen κ = 0.96, 95% CI = [0.94-0.97], P < .001). The diagnostic accuracy did not differ between contrast-free and postgadolinium reading sessions, being 0.97 for both groups and both reading sessions. For the 2 rater groups, there was good sensitivity for both contrast-free (0.83 and 0.85) and postgadolinium reading sessions (0.88 and 0.90, respectively). Moreover, there was excellent specificity (0.98) for both groups and reading sessions | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: Gadolinium chelate contrast administration showed no added value for accurate characterization of head and neck primary tumor extension and could possibly be avoided in the PET/MR imaging head and neck workflow | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 7 | |a Contrast Media |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Radiopharmaceuticals |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a 0Z5B2CJX4D |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Gadolinium |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a AU0V1LM3JT |2 NLM | |
700 | 1 | |a De Laroche, R |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Bera, G |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Giron, A |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Bertolus, C |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Herve, G |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Chambenois, E |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Bergeret, S |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Dormont, D |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Amor-Sahli, M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Kas, A |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology |d 1990 |g 41(2020), 10 vom: 24. Okt., Seite 1888-1896 |w (DE-627)NLM012664189 |x 1936-959X |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:41 |g year:2020 |g number:10 |g day:24 |g month:10 |g pages:1888-1896 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6764 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 41 |j 2020 |e 10 |b 24 |c 10 |h 1888-1896 |