Episiotomy wound healing by Commiphora myrrha (Nees) Engl. and Boswellia carteri Birdw. in primiparous women : A randomized controlled trial
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved..
ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE: Traditional Persian medicine manuscripts refer to plants such as Commiphora myrrha (Nees) Engl. (myrrh) and Boswellia carteri Birdw. (frankincense), which could be used to improve wound healing process. Since that time, local midwives in Iran continue to provide these herbs to precipitate episiotomy wound healing.
AIM OF THE STUDY: To investigate the efficacy and safety of myrrh- and frankincense-based sitz-baths on episiotomy wound healing in primiparous women.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This randomized controlled trial was conducted on 90 primiparous women with singleton pregnancies after normal vaginal delivery at Hafez hospital affiliated to Shiraz University of Medical Sciences from July to October 2019. Study participants were randomly allocated in three groups (2 intervention groups and 1 control group). Women in intervention groups were assigned to receive either 10-min sitz-bath of myrrh extract or frankincense extract twice a day for 1 week. While the women in control group received the betadine sitz-bath for the same period of time. The main outcome was the episiotomy wound healing, which was measured using the REEDA scale before intervention, on 2nd and 7th postpartum days.
RESULTS: An improvement in the episiotomy wound healing was significantly greater in patients receiving myrrh than those receiving the frankincense or betadine on 2nd (p = 0.003 and p < 0.001) and 7th (p = 0.043 and p = 0.015) postpartum days. However, the total REEDA score was not statistically different between the frankincense and betadine groups on 2nd and 7th postpartum days (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The present results suggest that myrrh was more efficient than frankincense and betadine in healing of the episiotomy wound and could be recommended as a safe natural therapy.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2021 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2021 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:264 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Journal of ethnopharmacology - 264(2021) vom: 10. Jan., Seite 113396 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Faraji, Azam [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
Episiotomy |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 01.03.2021 Date Revised 01.03.2021 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1016/j.jep.2020.113396 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM315419881 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM315419881 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231225154856.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231225s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.jep.2020.113396 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1051.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM315419881 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)32971163 | ||
035 | |a (PII)S0378-8741(20)33281-5 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Faraji, Azam |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Episiotomy wound healing by Commiphora myrrha (Nees) Engl. and Boswellia carteri Birdw. in primiparous women |b A randomized controlled trial |
264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 01.03.2021 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 01.03.2021 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. | ||
520 | |a ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE: Traditional Persian medicine manuscripts refer to plants such as Commiphora myrrha (Nees) Engl. (myrrh) and Boswellia carteri Birdw. (frankincense), which could be used to improve wound healing process. Since that time, local midwives in Iran continue to provide these herbs to precipitate episiotomy wound healing | ||
520 | |a AIM OF THE STUDY: To investigate the efficacy and safety of myrrh- and frankincense-based sitz-baths on episiotomy wound healing in primiparous women | ||
520 | |a MATERIALS AND METHODS: This randomized controlled trial was conducted on 90 primiparous women with singleton pregnancies after normal vaginal delivery at Hafez hospital affiliated to Shiraz University of Medical Sciences from July to October 2019. Study participants were randomly allocated in three groups (2 intervention groups and 1 control group). Women in intervention groups were assigned to receive either 10-min sitz-bath of myrrh extract or frankincense extract twice a day for 1 week. While the women in control group received the betadine sitz-bath for the same period of time. The main outcome was the episiotomy wound healing, which was measured using the REEDA scale before intervention, on 2nd and 7th postpartum days | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: An improvement in the episiotomy wound healing was significantly greater in patients receiving myrrh than those receiving the frankincense or betadine on 2nd (p = 0.003 and p < 0.001) and 7th (p = 0.043 and p = 0.015) postpartum days. However, the total REEDA score was not statistically different between the frankincense and betadine groups on 2nd and 7th postpartum days (p > 0.05) | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSION: The present results suggest that myrrh was more efficient than frankincense and betadine in healing of the episiotomy wound and could be recommended as a safe natural therapy | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Randomized Controlled Trial | |
650 | 4 | |a Episiotomy | |
650 | 4 | |a Frankincense | |
650 | 4 | |a Myrrh | |
650 | 4 | |a Primiparous | |
650 | 4 | |a Wound healing | |
650 | 7 | |a Plant Extracts |2 NLM | |
700 | 1 | |a Aghdaki, Maryam |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Hessami, Kamran |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Hosseinkhani, Ayda |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Roozmeh, Shohreh |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Asadi, Nasrin |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Vafaei, Homeira |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Kasraeian, Maryam |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Bagheri, Roya |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Bazrafshan, Khadije |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Foroughinia, Leila |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of ethnopharmacology |d 1980 |g 264(2021) vom: 10. Jan., Seite 113396 |w (DE-627)NLM00095196X |x 1872-7573 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:264 |g year:2021 |g day:10 |g month:01 |g pages:113396 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2020.113396 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 264 |j 2021 |b 10 |c 01 |h 113396 |