Perceval or Trifecta to Prevent Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch
The Trifecta aortic valve has excellent hemodynamics characteristics. Moreover, the Perceval prosthesis may achieve better hemodynamics than the conventional valves; therefore, it has been proposed to reduce the incidence of patient-prosthesis mismatch. Our aim was to compare the prevalence of this complication between both prostheses. All patients who underwent valve replacement with a Perceval or a Trifecta from 2016 to 2020 at our institution were included. We calculated the prevalence of patient-prosthesis mismatch for each prosthesis and size and performed a multinomial logistic regression model to investigate the impact of choosing one prosthesis over the other. A total of 516 patients were analyzed. Moderate mismatch was present in 33 (8.6%) in the Trifecta group and 28 (21.4%) in the Perceval group, p < 0.001. Severe mismatch was present in 8 (2.1%) patients with Trifecta and 5 (3.8%) patients with Perceval, p = 0.33. Compared with the Perceval, the Trifecta prosthesis was shown to reduce moderate patient-prosthesis mismatch: OR = 0.5 (95% CI 0.3-0.9, p = 0.02). Both prostheses led to a similar risk of severe patient-prosthesis mismatch: OR = 0.9 (95% CI 0.3-2.8, p = 0.79). Both prostheses provide a very low risk of severe patient-prosthesis mismatch. Compared with the Perceval prothesis, the Trifecta prosthesis is able to reduce by 50% the risk of moderate mismatch.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2020 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2020 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:9 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Journal of clinical medicine - 9(2020), 9 vom: 14. Sept. |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Hernandez-Vaquero, Daniel [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Aortic valve replacement |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Revised 28.10.2020 published: Electronic Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.3390/jcm9092964 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM315094818 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM315094818 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231225154152.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231225s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.3390/jcm9092964 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1050.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM315094818 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)32937912 | ||
| 035 | |a (PII)E2964 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Hernandez-Vaquero, Daniel |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Perceval or Trifecta to Prevent Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 28.10.2020 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a The Trifecta aortic valve has excellent hemodynamics characteristics. Moreover, the Perceval prosthesis may achieve better hemodynamics than the conventional valves; therefore, it has been proposed to reduce the incidence of patient-prosthesis mismatch. Our aim was to compare the prevalence of this complication between both prostheses. All patients who underwent valve replacement with a Perceval or a Trifecta from 2016 to 2020 at our institution were included. We calculated the prevalence of patient-prosthesis mismatch for each prosthesis and size and performed a multinomial logistic regression model to investigate the impact of choosing one prosthesis over the other. A total of 516 patients were analyzed. Moderate mismatch was present in 33 (8.6%) in the Trifecta group and 28 (21.4%) in the Perceval group, p < 0.001. Severe mismatch was present in 8 (2.1%) patients with Trifecta and 5 (3.8%) patients with Perceval, p = 0.33. Compared with the Perceval, the Trifecta prosthesis was shown to reduce moderate patient-prosthesis mismatch: OR = 0.5 (95% CI 0.3-0.9, p = 0.02). Both prostheses led to a similar risk of severe patient-prosthesis mismatch: OR = 0.9 (95% CI 0.3-2.8, p = 0.79). Both prostheses provide a very low risk of severe patient-prosthesis mismatch. Compared with the Perceval prothesis, the Trifecta prosthesis is able to reduce by 50% the risk of moderate mismatch | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a aortic valve replacement | |
| 650 | 4 | |a bioprosthesis | |
| 650 | 4 | |a patient–prosthesis mismatch | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Vigil-Escalera, Carlota |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Persia, Yvan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Morales, Carlos |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Pascual, Isaac |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Domínguez-Rodríguez, Alberto |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Rodríguez-Caulo, Emiliano |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Carnero, Manuel |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Díaz, Rocío |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Avanzas, Pablo |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Moris, Cesar |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Silva, Jacobo |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of clinical medicine |d 2012 |g 9(2020), 9 vom: 14. Sept. |w (DE-627)NLM230666310 |x 2077-0383 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:9 |g year:2020 |g number:9 |g day:14 |g month:09 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9092964 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 9 |j 2020 |e 9 |b 14 |c 09 | ||