Protocolized Based Management of Cerebrospinal Fluid Drains in Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair Procedures
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved..
BACKGROUND: Spinal cord ischemia (SCI) resulting in paraplegia is a devastating complication associated with thoracic endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (TEVAR) whose incidence has significantly declined over time. In this review, we present our experience with a multidisciplinary clinical protocol for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drain management in patients undergoing TEVAR. Furthermore, we aimed to characterize complications of CSF drain placement in a large, single center experience of patients who underwent TEVAR.
METHODS: This retrospective review is of patients undergoing TEVAR with and without CSF drain placement between January 2014 and December 2019 at a single institution. Patient demographics, hospital course, and drain-related complications were analyzed to assess the incidence of CSF drain-related complications.
RESULTS: A total of 235 patients were included in this study, of which 85 received CSF drains. Eighty patients (94.1%) were placed by anesthesiologists, while 5 (5.9%) were placed under fluoroscopic guidance by interventional neurosurgery. The most common level of placement was L3-L4 in 38 (44.7%) cases followed by L4-L5 in 36 (42.4%) cases. The mean duration of CSF drain was 1.9 ± 1.4 days. Complications due to CSF drainage occurred in 5 (5.9%) patients and included partial retainment of catheter, subdural edema, epidural hematoma, headache, and bleeding near the drain site. The overall 30-day mortality rate was 5.5% and did not differ between those who received a CSF drain and those who did not (P = 0.856). The overall incidence of SCI resulting in paraplegia was 1.7% in the studied patients.
CONCLUSIONS: A protocol-based CSF drainage program for spinal cord protection involves a multifaceted approach in identification and selection of patients meeting criteria for prophylactic drain placement, direct closed loop communication, and perioperative management by an experienced team. Despite the inherent advantages of CSF drain placement, it is not without complications, thus risk and benefit need to be weighed in context of the procedure and the patient with close communication and team approach.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2021 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2021 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:72 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Annals of vascular surgery - 72(2021) vom: 15. Apr., Seite 409-418 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Chaudhary, Omar [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 02.08.2021 Date Revised 07.12.2022 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1016/j.avsg.2020.08.134 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM314990666 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM314990666 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231225153932.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231225s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.08.134 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1049.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM314990666 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)32927046 | ||
| 035 | |a (PII)S0890-5096(20)30819-0 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Chaudhary, Omar |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Protocolized Based Management of Cerebrospinal Fluid Drains in Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair Procedures |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 02.08.2021 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 07.12.2022 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. | ||
| 520 | |a BACKGROUND: Spinal cord ischemia (SCI) resulting in paraplegia is a devastating complication associated with thoracic endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (TEVAR) whose incidence has significantly declined over time. In this review, we present our experience with a multidisciplinary clinical protocol for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drain management in patients undergoing TEVAR. Furthermore, we aimed to characterize complications of CSF drain placement in a large, single center experience of patients who underwent TEVAR | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: This retrospective review is of patients undergoing TEVAR with and without CSF drain placement between January 2014 and December 2019 at a single institution. Patient demographics, hospital course, and drain-related complications were analyzed to assess the incidence of CSF drain-related complications | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: A total of 235 patients were included in this study, of which 85 received CSF drains. Eighty patients (94.1%) were placed by anesthesiologists, while 5 (5.9%) were placed under fluoroscopic guidance by interventional neurosurgery. The most common level of placement was L3-L4 in 38 (44.7%) cases followed by L4-L5 in 36 (42.4%) cases. The mean duration of CSF drain was 1.9 ± 1.4 days. Complications due to CSF drainage occurred in 5 (5.9%) patients and included partial retainment of catheter, subdural edema, epidural hematoma, headache, and bleeding near the drain site. The overall 30-day mortality rate was 5.5% and did not differ between those who received a CSF drain and those who did not (P = 0.856). The overall incidence of SCI resulting in paraplegia was 1.7% in the studied patients | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: A protocol-based CSF drainage program for spinal cord protection involves a multifaceted approach in identification and selection of patients meeting criteria for prophylactic drain placement, direct closed loop communication, and perioperative management by an experienced team. Despite the inherent advantages of CSF drain placement, it is not without complications, thus risk and benefit need to be weighed in context of the procedure and the patient with close communication and team approach | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sharkey, Aidan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Schermerhorn, Marc |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Mahmood, Feroze |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Schaefer, Maximilian |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Bose, Ruma |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Pannu, Ameeka |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Fatima, Huma |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Baribeau, Yanick |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Krumm, Santiago |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Soden, Peter |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Thomas, Ajith |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Cassavaugh, Jessica |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Rashid, Rayan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Matyal, Robina |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Annals of vascular surgery |d 1995 |g 72(2021) vom: 15. Apr., Seite 409-418 |w (DE-627)NLM012991953 |x 1615-5947 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:72 |g year:2021 |g day:15 |g month:04 |g pages:409-418 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2020.08.134 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 72 |j 2021 |b 15 |c 04 |h 409-418 | ||