What Policies Address Both the Coronavirus Crisis and the Climate Crisis?
© Springer Nature B.V. 2020..
The coronavirus pandemic has led many countries to initiate unprecedented economic recovery packages. Policymakers tackling the coronavirus crisis have also been encouraged to prioritize policies which help mitigate a second, looming crisis: climate change. We identify and analyze policies that combat both the coronavirus crisis and the climate crisis. We analyze both the long-run climate impacts from coronavirus-related economic recovery policies, and the impacts of long-run climate policies on economic recovery and public health post-recession. We base our analysis on data on emissions, employment and corona-related layoffs across sectors, and on previous research. We show that, among climate policies, labor-intensive green infrastructure projects, planting trees, and in particular pricing carbon coupled with reduced labor taxation boost economic recovery. Among coronavirus policies, aiding services sectors (leisure services such as restaurants and culture, or professional services such as technology), education and the healthcare sector appear most promising, being labor intensive yet low-emission-if such sectoral aid is conditioned on being directed towards employment and on low-carbon supply chains. Large-scale green infrastructure projects and green R&D investment, while good for the climate, are unlikely to generate enough employment to effectively alleviate the coronavirus crisis.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2020 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2020 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:76 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Environmental & resource economics - 76(2020), 4 vom: 21., Seite 789-810 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Engström, Gustav [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Revised 04.04.2024 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1007/s10640-020-00451-y |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM314102809 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM314102809 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240404232310.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231225s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10640-020-00451-y |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1364.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM314102809 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)32836841 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Engström, Gustav |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a What Policies Address Both the Coronavirus Crisis and the Climate Crisis? |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 04.04.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a © Springer Nature B.V. 2020. | ||
| 520 | |a The coronavirus pandemic has led many countries to initiate unprecedented economic recovery packages. Policymakers tackling the coronavirus crisis have also been encouraged to prioritize policies which help mitigate a second, looming crisis: climate change. We identify and analyze policies that combat both the coronavirus crisis and the climate crisis. We analyze both the long-run climate impacts from coronavirus-related economic recovery policies, and the impacts of long-run climate policies on economic recovery and public health post-recession. We base our analysis on data on emissions, employment and corona-related layoffs across sectors, and on previous research. We show that, among climate policies, labor-intensive green infrastructure projects, planting trees, and in particular pricing carbon coupled with reduced labor taxation boost economic recovery. Among coronavirus policies, aiding services sectors (leisure services such as restaurants and culture, or professional services such as technology), education and the healthcare sector appear most promising, being labor intensive yet low-emission-if such sectoral aid is conditioned on being directed towards employment and on low-carbon supply chains. Large-scale green infrastructure projects and green R&D investment, while good for the climate, are unlikely to generate enough employment to effectively alleviate the coronavirus crisis | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Gars, Johan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Jaakkola, Niko |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lindahl, Therese |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Spiro, Daniel |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a van Benthem, Arthur A |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Environmental & resource economics |d 2014 |g 76(2020), 4 vom: 21., Seite 789-810 |w (DE-627)NLM243070799 |x 0924-6460 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:76 |g year:2020 |g number:4 |g day:21 |g pages:789-810 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10640-020-00451-y |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 76 |j 2020 |e 4 |b 21 |h 789-810 | ||