Resilience in older persons : A systematic review of the conceptual literature
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved..
Although ageing research increasingly incorporates resilience, a common notion on what resilience means is lacking. We aimed to give a comprehensive overview of the conceptual literature on resilience in older persons, identifying areas of consensus and variation/debate. A systematic search of eight databases from different disciplines led to the inclusion of 36 texts. Across the conceptual literature of resilience in older persons, three common features of descriptions of resilience were identified: a stressor, a response and a mechanism. Based on differences in their interpretation of how resilience is expressed we distinguished two perspectives. The first, classical and most widely applied perspective, describes the expression of resilience as a positive response to a high intensity stressor. The second, newer perspective, describes resilience in the context of responses relative to equilibrium, following low intensity stressors. Almost all descriptions across the two perspectives describe the resilience mechanism to be dynamic and emphasize the importance of the context in achieving resilience. This review provides clarity on the current conceptual status of resilience in older persons, an important step towards a higher level of consistency in the future use of resilience in ageing.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2020 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2020 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:63 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Ageing research reviews - 63(2020) vom: 05. Nov., Seite 101144 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Angevaare, M J [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Ageing |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 30.12.2020 Date Revised 31.05.2022 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1016/j.arr.2020.101144 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM314093311 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM314093311 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231225152003.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231225s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.arr.2020.101144 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1046.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM314093311 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)32835890 | ||
| 035 | |a (PII)S1568-1637(20)30279-8 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Angevaare, M J |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Resilience in older persons |b A systematic review of the conceptual literature |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 30.12.2020 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 31.05.2022 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. | ||
| 520 | |a Although ageing research increasingly incorporates resilience, a common notion on what resilience means is lacking. We aimed to give a comprehensive overview of the conceptual literature on resilience in older persons, identifying areas of consensus and variation/debate. A systematic search of eight databases from different disciplines led to the inclusion of 36 texts. Across the conceptual literature of resilience in older persons, three common features of descriptions of resilience were identified: a stressor, a response and a mechanism. Based on differences in their interpretation of how resilience is expressed we distinguished two perspectives. The first, classical and most widely applied perspective, describes the expression of resilience as a positive response to a high intensity stressor. The second, newer perspective, describes resilience in the context of responses relative to equilibrium, following low intensity stressors. Almost all descriptions across the two perspectives describe the resilience mechanism to be dynamic and emphasize the importance of the context in achieving resilience. This review provides clarity on the current conceptual status of resilience in older persons, an important step towards a higher level of consistency in the future use of resilience in ageing | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Systematic Review | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Ageing | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Concept | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Older persons | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Resilience | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Systematic review | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Roberts, J |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a van Hout, H P J |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Joling, K J |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Smalbrugge, M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Schoonmade, L J |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Windle, G |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Hertogh, C M P M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Ageing research reviews |d 2002 |g 63(2020) vom: 05. Nov., Seite 101144 |w (DE-627)NLM119138735 |x 1872-9649 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:63 |g year:2020 |g day:05 |g month:11 |g pages:101144 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2020.101144 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 63 |j 2020 |b 05 |c 11 |h 101144 | ||