Prospective Study Comparing Deep Throat Saliva With Other Respiratory Tract Specimens in the Diagnosis of Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissionsoup.com..
BACKGROUND: Self-collected specimens have been advocated to avoid infectious exposure to healthcare workers. Self-induced sputum in those with a productive cough and saliva in those without a productive cough have been proposed, but sensitivity remains uncertain.
METHODS: We performed a prospective study in 2 regional hospitals in Hong Kong.
RESULTS: We prospectively examined 563 serial samples collected during the virus shedding periods of 50 patients: 150 deep throat saliva (DTS), 309 pooled-nasopharyngeal (NP) and throat swabs, and 104 sputum. Deep throat saliva had the lowest overall reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-positive rate (68.7% vs 89.4% [sputum] and 80.9% [pooled NP and throat swabs]) and the lowest viral ribonucleic acid (RNA) concentration (mean log copy/mL 3.54 vs 5.03 [sputum] and 4.63 [pooled NP and throat swabs]). Analyses with respect to time from symptom onset and severity also revealed similar results. Virus yields of DTS correlated with that of sputum (Pearson correlation index 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.62-0.86). We estimated that the overall false-negative rate of DTS could be as high as 31.3% and increased 2.7 times among patients without sputum.
CONCLUSIONS: Deep throat saliva produced the lowest viral RNA concentration and RT-PCR-positive rate compared with conventional respiratory specimens in all phases of illness. Self-collected sputum should be the choice for patients with sputum.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2020 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2020 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:222 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
The Journal of infectious diseases - 222(2020), 10 vom: 13. Okt., Seite 1612-1619 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Lai, Christopher K C [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
COVID-19 |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 02.11.2020 Date Revised 18.12.2020 published: Print Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1093/infdis/jiaa487 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM313136084 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM313136084 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231225145922.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231225s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1093/infdis/jiaa487 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1043.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM313136084 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)32738137 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Lai, Christopher K C |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Prospective Study Comparing Deep Throat Saliva With Other Respiratory Tract Specimens in the Diagnosis of Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 |
264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 02.11.2020 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 18.12.2020 | ||
500 | |a published: Print | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissionsoup.com. | ||
520 | |a BACKGROUND: Self-collected specimens have been advocated to avoid infectious exposure to healthcare workers. Self-induced sputum in those with a productive cough and saliva in those without a productive cough have been proposed, but sensitivity remains uncertain | ||
520 | |a METHODS: We performed a prospective study in 2 regional hospitals in Hong Kong | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: We prospectively examined 563 serial samples collected during the virus shedding periods of 50 patients: 150 deep throat saliva (DTS), 309 pooled-nasopharyngeal (NP) and throat swabs, and 104 sputum. Deep throat saliva had the lowest overall reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-positive rate (68.7% vs 89.4% [sputum] and 80.9% [pooled NP and throat swabs]) and the lowest viral ribonucleic acid (RNA) concentration (mean log copy/mL 3.54 vs 5.03 [sputum] and 4.63 [pooled NP and throat swabs]). Analyses with respect to time from symptom onset and severity also revealed similar results. Virus yields of DTS correlated with that of sputum (Pearson correlation index 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.62-0.86). We estimated that the overall false-negative rate of DTS could be as high as 31.3% and increased 2.7 times among patients without sputum | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: Deep throat saliva produced the lowest viral RNA concentration and RT-PCR-positive rate compared with conventional respiratory specimens in all phases of illness. Self-collected sputum should be the choice for patients with sputum | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't | |
650 | 4 | |a COVID-19 | |
650 | 4 | |a SARS-CoV-2 | |
650 | 4 | |a coronavirus | |
650 | 4 | |a diagnosis | |
650 | 4 | |a saliva | |
650 | 7 | |a COVID-19 Vaccines |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Covid-19 aAPC vaccine |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a RNA, Viral |2 NLM | |
700 | 1 | |a Chen, Zigui |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Lui, Grace |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Ling, Lowell |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Li, Timothy |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Wong, Martin C S |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Ng, Rita W Y |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Tso, Eugene Y K |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Ho, Tracy |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Fung, Kitty S C |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Ng, Siu T |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Wong, Barry K C |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Boon, Siaw S |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Hui, David S C |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Chan, Paul K S |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t The Journal of infectious diseases |d 1945 |g 222(2020), 10 vom: 13. Okt., Seite 1612-1619 |w (DE-627)NLM000005819 |x 1537-6613 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:222 |g year:2020 |g number:10 |g day:13 |g month:10 |g pages:1612-1619 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiaa487 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 222 |j 2020 |e 10 |b 13 |c 10 |h 1612-1619 |