Performance Comparison of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells with Nafion and Aquivion Perfluorosulfonic Acids with Different Equivalent Weights as the Electrode Binders
Copyright © 2020 American Chemical Society..
A perfluorosulfonic acid (PFSA) ionomer, used as the proton conductor in the catalyst layer, influences significantly the performance of proton exchange membrane fuel cell catalyst-coated membrane (CCM). In this paper, SSC-CCM is prepared by the SSC-PFSA (Aquivion, EW 720) ionomer, and the comparative sample (LSC-CCM) is based on the LSC-PFSA ionomer (Nafion, EW 1100). Compared with LSC-CCM, SSC-CCM shows higher porosity, larger electrochemical surface area (ECSA), and smaller high-frequency resistance. Polarization curves of SSC-CCM tested by the short stack show better performance than those of LSC-CCM, especially under the lower relative humidity operations. Moreover, the SSC-CCM outputs higher voltage and is more stable in the dynamic process with temperature continuously increasing under lower relative humidity operation. Such excellent performance of SSC-CCM is confirmed from the higher proton conductivity of SSC-PFSA under low relative humidity. These results indicate that the SSC-PFSA ionomer could be employed for the CCM catalyst layer under the operation conditions of low relative humidity and dynamic running for automotive applications.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2020 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2020 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:5 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
ACS omega - 5(2020), 28 vom: 21. Juli, Seite 17628-17636 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Li, Ting [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Revised 28.09.2020 published: Electronic-eCollection Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1021/acsomega.0c02110 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM312911173 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM312911173 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231225145433.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231225s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1021/acsomega.0c02110 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1043.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM312911173 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)32715248 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Li, Ting |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Performance Comparison of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells with Nafion and Aquivion Perfluorosulfonic Acids with Different Equivalent Weights as the Electrode Binders |
264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 28.09.2020 | ||
500 | |a published: Electronic-eCollection | ||
500 | |a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a Copyright © 2020 American Chemical Society. | ||
520 | |a A perfluorosulfonic acid (PFSA) ionomer, used as the proton conductor in the catalyst layer, influences significantly the performance of proton exchange membrane fuel cell catalyst-coated membrane (CCM). In this paper, SSC-CCM is prepared by the SSC-PFSA (Aquivion, EW 720) ionomer, and the comparative sample (LSC-CCM) is based on the LSC-PFSA ionomer (Nafion, EW 1100). Compared with LSC-CCM, SSC-CCM shows higher porosity, larger electrochemical surface area (ECSA), and smaller high-frequency resistance. Polarization curves of SSC-CCM tested by the short stack show better performance than those of LSC-CCM, especially under the lower relative humidity operations. Moreover, the SSC-CCM outputs higher voltage and is more stable in the dynamic process with temperature continuously increasing under lower relative humidity operation. Such excellent performance of SSC-CCM is confirmed from the higher proton conductivity of SSC-PFSA under low relative humidity. These results indicate that the SSC-PFSA ionomer could be employed for the CCM catalyst layer under the operation conditions of low relative humidity and dynamic running for automotive applications | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
700 | 1 | |a Shen, Jiabin |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Chen, Guangying |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Guo, Shaoyun |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Xie, Guangyou |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t ACS omega |d 2016 |g 5(2020), 28 vom: 21. Juli, Seite 17628-17636 |w (DE-627)NLM264243048 |x 2470-1343 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:5 |g year:2020 |g number:28 |g day:21 |g month:07 |g pages:17628-17636 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c02110 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 5 |j 2020 |e 28 |b 21 |c 07 |h 17628-17636 |