Cognitive Screening of Adults With Postlingual Hearing Loss : A Systematic Review
OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the evidence for the use of cognitive screening tools for adults with postlingual hearing loss.
DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, PsycINFO (EBSCO), CINAHL (EBSCO), and CENTRAL (Cochrane Library) electronic databases were searched from inception until October 4, 2018.
REVIEW METHODS: Articles were reviewed for inclusion by 2 independent reviewers. The references of included articles were hand-searched for additional relevant articles. Data were extracted by 2 independent extractors.
RESULTS: Of 2092 articles imported from the search, 81 were included for the review. Nearly a third (31%, n = 25) included patients with profound hearing loss. In total, 23 unique tools were used for 105 unique applications. The Mini Mental Status Exam (MMSE) was the most commonly used (54%, n = 55), followed by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) (19%, n = 10). Nearly half of the tools were used to define patient inclusion or exclusion in a study (48%, n = 50), followed by examination of a change after an intervention (26%, n = 27). Two articles attempted to study the validity of the MMSE and MoCA for screening patients with mild to moderate hearing loss and found mixed effects of the auditory components. There were no validation studies identified from the search.
CONCLUSION: Many different cognitive screening tools have been used to study patients with postlingual hearing loss. The effects of the auditory components of these tools may be deleterious but ultimately remain unclear from the available evidence. To date, there has been no validation of any cognitive screening tool to be used for adults with postlingual hearing loss.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2021 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2021 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:164 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery - 164(2021), 1 vom: 15. Jan., Seite 49-56 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Raymond, Mallory [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Age-related hearing loss |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 19.04.2021 Date Revised 19.04.2021 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1177/0194599820933255 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM312661843 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM312661843 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231225144908.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231225s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1177/0194599820933255 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1042.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM312661843 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)32689874 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Raymond, Mallory |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Cognitive Screening of Adults With Postlingual Hearing Loss |b A Systematic Review |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 19.04.2021 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 19.04.2021 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the evidence for the use of cognitive screening tools for adults with postlingual hearing loss | ||
| 520 | |a DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, PsycINFO (EBSCO), CINAHL (EBSCO), and CENTRAL (Cochrane Library) electronic databases were searched from inception until October 4, 2018 | ||
| 520 | |a REVIEW METHODS: Articles were reviewed for inclusion by 2 independent reviewers. The references of included articles were hand-searched for additional relevant articles. Data were extracted by 2 independent extractors | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: Of 2092 articles imported from the search, 81 were included for the review. Nearly a third (31%, n = 25) included patients with profound hearing loss. In total, 23 unique tools were used for 105 unique applications. The Mini Mental Status Exam (MMSE) was the most commonly used (54%, n = 55), followed by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) (19%, n = 10). Nearly half of the tools were used to define patient inclusion or exclusion in a study (48%, n = 50), followed by examination of a change after an intervention (26%, n = 27). Two articles attempted to study the validity of the MMSE and MoCA for screening patients with mild to moderate hearing loss and found mixed effects of the auditory components. There were no validation studies identified from the search | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSION: Many different cognitive screening tools have been used to study patients with postlingual hearing loss. The effects of the auditory components of these tools may be deleterious but ultimately remain unclear from the available evidence. To date, there has been no validation of any cognitive screening tool to be used for adults with postlingual hearing loss | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Systematic Review | |
| 650 | 4 | |a age-related hearing loss | |
| 650 | 4 | |a cognitive screen | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Barrett, Devon |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lee, Daniel Juno |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Peterson, Shenita |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Raol, Nikhila |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Vivas, Esther X |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery |d 1982 |g 164(2021), 1 vom: 15. Jan., Seite 49-56 |w (DE-627)NLM012595721 |x 1097-6817 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:164 |g year:2021 |g number:1 |g day:15 |g month:01 |g pages:49-56 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0194599820933255 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 164 |j 2021 |e 1 |b 15 |c 01 |h 49-56 | ||