Classifying the diagnosis of study participants in clinical trials : a structured and efficient approach
BACKGROUND: A challenge in imaging research is a diagnostic classification of study participants. We hypothesised that a structured approach would be efficient and that classification by medical students, residents, and an expert panel whenever necessary would be as valid as classification of all patients by experts.
METHODS: OPTIMACT is a randomised trial designed to evaluate the effectiveness of replacing chest x-ray for ultra-low-dose chest computed tomography (CT) at the emergency department. We developed a handbook with diagnostic guidelines and randomly selected 240 cases from 2,418 participants enrolled in OPTIMACT. Each case was independently classified by two medical students and, if they disagreed, by the students and a resident in a consensus meeting. Cases without consensus and cases classified as complex were assessed by a panel of medical specialists. To evaluate the validity, 60 randomly selected cases not referred to the panel by the students and the residents were reassessed by the specialists.
RESULTS: Overall, the students and, if necessary, residents were able to assign a diagnosis in 183 of the 240 cases (76% concordance; 95% confidence interval [CI] 71-82%). We observed agreement between students and residents versus medical specialists in 50/60 cases (83% concordance; 95% CI 74-93%).
CONCLUSIONS: A structured approach in which study participants are assigned diagnostic labels by assessors with increasing levels of medical experience was an efficient and valid classification method, limiting the workload for medical specialists. We presented a viable option for classifying study participants in large-scale imaging trials (Netherlands National Trial Register number NTR6163).
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2020 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2020 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:4 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
European radiology experimental - 4(2020), 1 vom: 17. Juli, Seite 44 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
van Engelen, Tjitske S R [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
Computed |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 28.04.2021 Date Revised 28.04.2021 published: Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1186/s41747-020-00169-y |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM312532628 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM312532628 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231225144620.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231225s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1186/s41747-020-00169-y |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1041.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM312532628 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)32676897 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a van Engelen, Tjitske S R |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Classifying the diagnosis of study participants in clinical trials |b a structured and efficient approach |
264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 28.04.2021 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 28.04.2021 | ||
500 | |a published: Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a BACKGROUND: A challenge in imaging research is a diagnostic classification of study participants. We hypothesised that a structured approach would be efficient and that classification by medical students, residents, and an expert panel whenever necessary would be as valid as classification of all patients by experts | ||
520 | |a METHODS: OPTIMACT is a randomised trial designed to evaluate the effectiveness of replacing chest x-ray for ultra-low-dose chest computed tomography (CT) at the emergency department. We developed a handbook with diagnostic guidelines and randomly selected 240 cases from 2,418 participants enrolled in OPTIMACT. Each case was independently classified by two medical students and, if they disagreed, by the students and a resident in a consensus meeting. Cases without consensus and cases classified as complex were assessed by a panel of medical specialists. To evaluate the validity, 60 randomly selected cases not referred to the panel by the students and the residents were reassessed by the specialists | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: Overall, the students and, if necessary, residents were able to assign a diagnosis in 183 of the 240 cases (76% concordance; 95% confidence interval [CI] 71-82%). We observed agreement between students and residents versus medical specialists in 50/60 cases (83% concordance; 95% CI 74-93%) | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: A structured approach in which study participants are assigned diagnostic labels by assessors with increasing levels of medical experience was an efficient and valid classification method, limiting the workload for medical specialists. We presented a viable option for classifying study participants in large-scale imaging trials (Netherlands National Trial Register number NTR6163) | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Randomized Controlled Trial | |
650 | 4 | |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't | |
650 | 4 | |a Emergency service (hospital) | |
650 | 4 | |a Methods | |
650 | 4 | |a Observer variation | |
650 | 4 | |a Radiography (thoracic) | |
650 | 4 | |a Tomography x-ray | |
650 | 4 | |a computed | |
700 | 1 | |a Kanglie, Maadrika M N P |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a van den Berk, Inge A H |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Bouwman, Merel L J |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Suhooli, Hind J M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Heckert, Sascha L |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Stoker, Jaap |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Bossuyt, Patrick M M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Prins, Jan M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a OPTIMACT Study Group |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Annema, Jouke |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Beenen, Ludo F M |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a van den Berk, Inge A H |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Bipat, Shandra |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Bossuyt, Patrick M M |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Bresser, Paul |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Dijkgraaf, Marcel |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Donker, Jos |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a van Engelen, Tjitske S R |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Frankemölle, Betty |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Groenink, Maarten |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Hochheimer, Suzanne M R |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Holleman, Frits |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Hulzebosch, Dorine |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Kanglie, Maadrika M N P |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Keijzers, Mitran |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a van der Lee, Ivo |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Leenhouts, Peter |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Luitse, Jan |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Meijboom, Lilian J |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Middeldorp, Saskia |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Montauban van Swijndregt, Alexander |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a de Monyé, Wouter |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Otker, Jacqueline |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Ridderikhof, Milan |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Romijn, Johannes A |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Schoonderwoerd, Antoinet J N |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Sprengers, Ralf W |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Stoker, Jaap |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Taal, Elizabeth M |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Winter, Michiel |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Prins, Jan M |e investigator |4 oth | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t European radiology experimental |d 2017 |g 4(2020), 1 vom: 17. Juli, Seite 44 |w (DE-627)NLM283556358 |x 2509-9280 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:4 |g year:2020 |g number:1 |g day:17 |g month:07 |g pages:44 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-020-00169-y |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 4 |j 2020 |e 1 |b 17 |c 07 |h 44 |