Risk of fetal loss following amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling in twin pregnancy : systematic review and meta-analysis
© 2020 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology..
OBJECTIVE: To assess the rate of fetal loss following amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling (CVS) in twin pregnancy.
METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases were searched for studies reporting procedure-related complications following amniocentesis or CVS in twin pregnancy. The primary outcome was the rate of procedure-related fetal loss. The secondary outcomes were fetal loss occurring before 24 weeks of gestation and fetal loss occurring within 4 weeks after the procedure. Head-to-head meta-analyses were used to compare directly each outcome, between women undergoing amniocentesis and those not undergoing amniocentesis and between women undergoing CVS and those not undergoing CVS, and to compute pooled risk differences (RD) between women exposed and those not exposed to each invasive procedure. Additionally, meta-analyses of proportions were used to estimate the pooled rates of each of the three outcomes in women undergoing amniocentesis or CVS and in controls.
RESULTS: Sixteen studies (3419 twin pregnancies undergoing and 2517 not undergoing an invasive procedure) were included. Head-to-head meta-analyses comparing directly twin pregnancies undergoing and those not undergoing amniocentesis showed a higher risk for overall fetal loss in those undergoing amniocentesis (odds ratio (OR), 1.46 (P = 0.04); RD, 0.013 (P = 0.04)), while there was no difference in the risk of either fetal loss before 24 weeks of gestation (OR, 1.59 (P = 0.06); RD, 0.010 (P = 0.11)) or fetal loss within 4 weeks after the procedure (OR, 1.38 (P = 0.3); RD, 0.003 (P = 0.8)). Overall, the pooled rate of fetal loss was 2.4% (95% CI, 1.4-3.6%) in twin pregnancies undergoing amniocentesis compared with 2.4% (95% CI, 0.9-4.6%) in those not undergoing amniocentesis. Head-to-head meta-analyses directly comparing twin pregnancies undergoing and those not undergoing CVS showed no significant difference in either overall fetal loss (OR, 1.61 (P = 0.5); RD, 0.003 (P = 0.8)) or fetal loss before 24 weeks of gestation (OR, 1.61 (P = 0.5); RD, 0.003 (P = 0.8)). Overall, the pooled rate of fetal loss was 2.0% (95% CI, 0.0-6.5%) in twin pregnancies undergoing CVS compared with 1.8% (95% CI, 0.3-4.2%) in those not undergoing CVS.
CONCLUSION: The risk of fetal loss following amniocentesis and CVS in twins is lower than reported previously and the rate of fetal loss before 24 weeks of gestation, or within 4 weeks after the procedure, did not differ from the background risk in twin pregnancy not undergoing invasive prenatal testing. These data can guide prenatal counseling for twin pregnancies undergoing invasive procedures. © 2020 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2020 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2020 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:56 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology - 56(2020), 5 vom: 25. Nov., Seite 647-655 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Di Mascio, D [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
Amniocentesis |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 03.12.2021 Date Revised 14.12.2021 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1002/uog.22143 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM312106297 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM312106297 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231225143710.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231225s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1002/uog.22143 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1040.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM312106297 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)32632979 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Di Mascio, D |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Risk of fetal loss following amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling in twin pregnancy |b systematic review and meta-analysis |
264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 03.12.2021 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 14.12.2021 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a © 2020 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. | ||
520 | |a OBJECTIVE: To assess the rate of fetal loss following amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling (CVS) in twin pregnancy | ||
520 | |a METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases were searched for studies reporting procedure-related complications following amniocentesis or CVS in twin pregnancy. The primary outcome was the rate of procedure-related fetal loss. The secondary outcomes were fetal loss occurring before 24 weeks of gestation and fetal loss occurring within 4 weeks after the procedure. Head-to-head meta-analyses were used to compare directly each outcome, between women undergoing amniocentesis and those not undergoing amniocentesis and between women undergoing CVS and those not undergoing CVS, and to compute pooled risk differences (RD) between women exposed and those not exposed to each invasive procedure. Additionally, meta-analyses of proportions were used to estimate the pooled rates of each of the three outcomes in women undergoing amniocentesis or CVS and in controls | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: Sixteen studies (3419 twin pregnancies undergoing and 2517 not undergoing an invasive procedure) were included. Head-to-head meta-analyses comparing directly twin pregnancies undergoing and those not undergoing amniocentesis showed a higher risk for overall fetal loss in those undergoing amniocentesis (odds ratio (OR), 1.46 (P = 0.04); RD, 0.013 (P = 0.04)), while there was no difference in the risk of either fetal loss before 24 weeks of gestation (OR, 1.59 (P = 0.06); RD, 0.010 (P = 0.11)) or fetal loss within 4 weeks after the procedure (OR, 1.38 (P = 0.3); RD, 0.003 (P = 0.8)). Overall, the pooled rate of fetal loss was 2.4% (95% CI, 1.4-3.6%) in twin pregnancies undergoing amniocentesis compared with 2.4% (95% CI, 0.9-4.6%) in those not undergoing amniocentesis. Head-to-head meta-analyses directly comparing twin pregnancies undergoing and those not undergoing CVS showed no significant difference in either overall fetal loss (OR, 1.61 (P = 0.5); RD, 0.003 (P = 0.8)) or fetal loss before 24 weeks of gestation (OR, 1.61 (P = 0.5); RD, 0.003 (P = 0.8)). Overall, the pooled rate of fetal loss was 2.0% (95% CI, 0.0-6.5%) in twin pregnancies undergoing CVS compared with 1.8% (95% CI, 0.3-4.2%) in those not undergoing CVS | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSION: The risk of fetal loss following amniocentesis and CVS in twins is lower than reported previously and the rate of fetal loss before 24 weeks of gestation, or within 4 weeks after the procedure, did not differ from the background risk in twin pregnancy not undergoing invasive prenatal testing. These data can guide prenatal counseling for twin pregnancies undergoing invasive procedures. © 2020 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Meta-Analysis | |
650 | 4 | |a Systematic Review | |
650 | 4 | |a CVS | |
650 | 4 | |a amniocentesis | |
650 | 4 | |a chorionic villus sampling | |
650 | 4 | |a fetal loss | |
650 | 4 | |a invasive | |
650 | 4 | |a miscarriage | |
650 | 4 | |a twin pregnancy | |
650 | 4 | |a twins | |
700 | 1 | |a Khalil, A |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Rizzo, G |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Buca, D |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Liberati, M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Martellucci, C A |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Flacco, M E |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Manzoli, L |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a D'Antonio, F |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology |d 1991 |g 56(2020), 5 vom: 25. Nov., Seite 647-655 |w (DE-627)NLM075077388 |x 1469-0705 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:56 |g year:2020 |g number:5 |g day:25 |g month:11 |g pages:647-655 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.22143 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 56 |j 2020 |e 5 |b 25 |c 11 |h 647-655 |