SARS-CoV-2 and HIV protease inhibitors : why lopinavir/ritonavir will not work for COVID-19 infection
Since the beginning of the outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus (CoV) 2, lopinavir/ritonavir was selected for treatment. The recent publication of Cao et al. in the New England Journal of Medicine showed that lopinavir/ritonavir treatment did not accelerate clinical improvement compared with standard of care. This raised the question of whether in retrospect we could have known this. The aim of this paper is to gather all the available evidence and to comprehensively discuss this issue.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2020 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2020 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:25 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Antiviral therapy - 25(2020), 7 vom: 25., Seite 345-347 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Smolders, Elise J [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
2494G1JF75 |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 18.05.2021 Date Revised 07.12.2022 published: Print Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.3851/IMP3365 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM311674313 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM311674313 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231225142745.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231225s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.3851/IMP3365 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1038.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM311674313 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)32589165 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Smolders, Elise J |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a SARS-CoV-2 and HIV protease inhibitors |b why lopinavir/ritonavir will not work for COVID-19 infection |
264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 18.05.2021 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 07.12.2022 | ||
500 | |a published: Print | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a Since the beginning of the outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus (CoV) 2, lopinavir/ritonavir was selected for treatment. The recent publication of Cao et al. in the New England Journal of Medicine showed that lopinavir/ritonavir treatment did not accelerate clinical improvement compared with standard of care. This raised the question of whether in retrospect we could have known this. The aim of this paper is to gather all the available evidence and to comprehensively discuss this issue | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 7 | |a Antiviral Agents |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Lopinavir |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a 2494G1JF75 |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Ritonavir |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a O3J8G9O825 |2 NLM | |
700 | 1 | |a Te Brake, Lindsey Hm |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Burger, David M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Antiviral therapy |d 1996 |g 25(2020), 7 vom: 25., Seite 345-347 |w (DE-627)NLM097535710 |x 2040-2058 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:25 |g year:2020 |g number:7 |g day:25 |g pages:345-347 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.3851/IMP3365 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 25 |j 2020 |e 7 |b 25 |h 345-347 |