Propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia improves survival compared to desflurane anesthesia in gastric cancer surgery : A retrospective analysis
Surgical management of cancer may induce stress and increase the likelihood of cancer metastasis and recurrence. Appropriate surgical and anesthetic techniques may affect the patient's outcome. Although numerous studies have been performed, conflicting results have been obtained regarding the effect of anesthetic techniques on the outcome of patients with cancer. We conducted this study to evaluate the association of anesthetic techniques with overall and recurrence-free survival in patients who had undergone gastric cancer surgery.This retrospective study reviewed the electronic medical records of patients, who had visited our hospital and had been diagnosed with gastric cancer between July 1st, 2006 to June 30th, 2016. Univariate analysis of the potential prognostic factors was performed using the log-rank test for categorical factors, and parameters with a P-value < .05 at the univariate step were included in the multivariate regression analysis. Propensity Score Matching was performed to account for differences in baseline characteristics: propofol or desflurane, in a 1:1 ratio.A total of 408 patients anesthetized with desflurane (218) and propofol (190) were eligible for analysis. After propensity matching, 167 patients remained in each group. The overall mortality rate was significantly higher in the desflurane group (56%) than in the propofol group (34%) during follow-up (P < .001). In addition, a greater percentage of patients in the desflurane group (41%) exhibited postoperative metastasis than those in the propofol group (19%, P < .001).The authors found some association between types of anesthesia used and the long-term prognosis of gastric cancer. Propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia improved survival and reduced the risk of recurrence and metastasis during the 5-year follow-up period after gastric cancer surgery.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2020 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2020 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:99 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Medicine - 99(2020), 25 vom: 19. Juni, Seite e20714 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Huang, Nian-Cih [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Anesthetics, Inhalation |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 06.07.2020 Date Revised 05.10.2022 published: Print Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1097/MD.0000000000020714 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM311477801 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM311477801 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231225142335.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231225s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1097/MD.0000000000020714 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1038.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM311477801 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)32569207 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Huang, Nian-Cih |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia improves survival compared to desflurane anesthesia in gastric cancer surgery |b A retrospective analysis |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 06.07.2020 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 05.10.2022 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a Surgical management of cancer may induce stress and increase the likelihood of cancer metastasis and recurrence. Appropriate surgical and anesthetic techniques may affect the patient's outcome. Although numerous studies have been performed, conflicting results have been obtained regarding the effect of anesthetic techniques on the outcome of patients with cancer. We conducted this study to evaluate the association of anesthetic techniques with overall and recurrence-free survival in patients who had undergone gastric cancer surgery.This retrospective study reviewed the electronic medical records of patients, who had visited our hospital and had been diagnosed with gastric cancer between July 1st, 2006 to June 30th, 2016. Univariate analysis of the potential prognostic factors was performed using the log-rank test for categorical factors, and parameters with a P-value < .05 at the univariate step were included in the multivariate regression analysis. Propensity Score Matching was performed to account for differences in baseline characteristics: propofol or desflurane, in a 1:1 ratio.A total of 408 patients anesthetized with desflurane (218) and propofol (190) were eligible for analysis. After propensity matching, 167 patients remained in each group. The overall mortality rate was significantly higher in the desflurane group (56%) than in the propofol group (34%) during follow-up (P < .001). In addition, a greater percentage of patients in the desflurane group (41%) exhibited postoperative metastasis than those in the propofol group (19%, P < .001).The authors found some association between types of anesthesia used and the long-term prognosis of gastric cancer. Propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia improved survival and reduced the risk of recurrence and metastasis during the 5-year follow-up period after gastric cancer surgery | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Comparative Study | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Observational Study | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Anesthetics, Inhalation |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Anesthetics, Intravenous |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Desflurane |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a CRS35BZ94Q |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Propofol |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a YI7VU623SF |2 NLM | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lee, Meei-Shyuan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lai, Hou-Chuan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lin, Han-Ting |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Huang, Yi-Hsuan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lu, Chueng-He |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Hsu, Chen-Heng |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wu, Zhi-Fu |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Medicine |d 1945 |g 99(2020), 25 vom: 19. Juni, Seite e20714 |w (DE-627)NLM000020737 |x 1536-5964 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:99 |g year:2020 |g number:25 |g day:19 |g month:06 |g pages:e20714 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000020714 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 99 |j 2020 |e 25 |b 19 |c 06 |h e20714 | ||