Tracheostomy intervention in intubated COVID positive patients : A survey of current clinical practice among ENT surgeons
© 2020 The Authors. Head & Neck published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc..
INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in an unprecedented need for critical care intervention. Prolonged intubation and mechanical ventilation has resulted in the need for tracheostomy in some patients. The purpose of this international survey was to assess optimal timing, technique and outcome for this intervention.
METHODS: An online survey was generated. Otorhinolaryngologists from both the United Kingdom and Abroad were polled with regards to their experience of tracheostomy in COVID-19 positive ventilated patients.
RESULTS: The survey was completed by 50 respondents from 16 nations. The number of ventilated patients totalled 3403, on average 9.7% required a tracheostomy. This was on average performed on day 14 following intubation. The majority of patients were successfully weaned (mean 7.4 days following tracheostomy).
CONCLUSION: The results of this brief survey suggest that tracheostomy is of benefit in selected patients. There was insufficient data to suggest improved outcomes with either percutaneous vs an open surgical technique.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2020 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2020 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:42 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Head & neck - 42(2020), 7 vom: 30. Juli, Seite 1382-1385 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
D'Souza, Ayman [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 22.07.2020 Date Revised 16.07.2022 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1002/hed.26274 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM310811732 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM310811732 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231225140914.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231225s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1002/hed.26274 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1036.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM310811732 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)32501600 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a D'Souza, Ayman |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Tracheostomy intervention in intubated COVID positive patients |b A survey of current clinical practice among ENT surgeons |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 22.07.2020 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 16.07.2022 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a © 2020 The Authors. Head & Neck published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. | ||
| 520 | |a INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in an unprecedented need for critical care intervention. Prolonged intubation and mechanical ventilation has resulted in the need for tracheostomy in some patients. The purpose of this international survey was to assess optimal timing, technique and outcome for this intervention | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: An online survey was generated. Otorhinolaryngologists from both the United Kingdom and Abroad were polled with regards to their experience of tracheostomy in COVID-19 positive ventilated patients | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: The survey was completed by 50 respondents from 16 nations. The number of ventilated patients totalled 3403, on average 9.7% required a tracheostomy. This was on average performed on day 14 following intubation. The majority of patients were successfully weaned (mean 7.4 days following tracheostomy) | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSION: The results of this brief survey suggest that tracheostomy is of benefit in selected patients. There was insufficient data to suggest improved outcomes with either percutaneous vs an open surgical technique | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Comparative Study | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Multicenter Study | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Simo, Ricard |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a D'Souza, Alwyn |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Vaz, Francis |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Prior, Andrew |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kanegaonkar, Rahul |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Head & neck |d 1996 |g 42(2020), 7 vom: 30. Juli, Seite 1382-1385 |w (DE-627)NLM012791806 |x 1097-0347 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:42 |g year:2020 |g number:7 |g day:30 |g month:07 |g pages:1382-1385 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hed.26274 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 42 |j 2020 |e 7 |b 30 |c 07 |h 1382-1385 | ||