A comparative study on the time to achieve negative nucleic acid testing and hospital stays between danoprevir and lopinavir/ritonavir in the treatment of patients with COVID-19
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC..
In late December 2019, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) first broke out in Wuhan, China, and has now become a global pandemic. However, there is no specific antiviral treatment for COVID-19. This study enrolled 33 COVID-19 patients in the nineth hospital of Nanchang from 27th January to 24th February 2020. Clinical indexes of patients upon admission/discharge were examined. Patients were divided into two groups according to different treatment plans (danoprevir and lopinavir/ritonavir). The days to achieve negative nucleic acid testing and the days of hospital stays were counted and statistically analyzed. COVID-19 patients treated with danoprevir or lopinavir/ritonavir were all improved and discharged. Indexes like blood routine, inflammation and immune-related indexes were significantly recovered after treatment. Additionally, under the circumstance that there was no significant difference in patients' general information between the two groups, we found that the mean time to achieve both negative nucleic acid testing and hospital stays of patients treated with danoprevir were significantly shorter than those of patients with lopinavir/ritonavir. Collectively, applying danoprevir is a good treatment plan for COVID-19 patients.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2020 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2020 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:92 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Journal of medical virology - 92(2020), 11 vom: 01. Nov., Seite 2631-2636 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Zhang, Zhicheng [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 24.12.2020 Date Revised 07.12.2022 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1002/jmv.26141 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM310811082 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM310811082 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231225140913.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231225s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1002/jmv.26141 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1036.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM310811082 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)32501538 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Zhang, Zhicheng |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 2 | |a A comparative study on the time to achieve negative nucleic acid testing and hospital stays between danoprevir and lopinavir/ritonavir in the treatment of patients with COVID-19 |
264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 24.12.2020 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 07.12.2022 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a © 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC. | ||
520 | |a In late December 2019, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) first broke out in Wuhan, China, and has now become a global pandemic. However, there is no specific antiviral treatment for COVID-19. This study enrolled 33 COVID-19 patients in the nineth hospital of Nanchang from 27th January to 24th February 2020. Clinical indexes of patients upon admission/discharge were examined. Patients were divided into two groups according to different treatment plans (danoprevir and lopinavir/ritonavir). The days to achieve negative nucleic acid testing and the days of hospital stays were counted and statistically analyzed. COVID-19 patients treated with danoprevir or lopinavir/ritonavir were all improved and discharged. Indexes like blood routine, inflammation and immune-related indexes were significantly recovered after treatment. Additionally, under the circumstance that there was no significant difference in patients' general information between the two groups, we found that the mean time to achieve both negative nucleic acid testing and hospital stays of patients treated with danoprevir were significantly shorter than those of patients with lopinavir/ritonavir. Collectively, applying danoprevir is a good treatment plan for COVID-19 patients | ||
650 | 4 | |a Comparative Study | |
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't | |
650 | 4 | |a COVID-19 | |
650 | 4 | |a danoprevir | |
650 | 4 | |a lopinavir/ritonavir | |
650 | 4 | |a time to achieve negative nucleic acid testing | |
650 | 7 | |a Antiviral Agents |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Cyclopropanes |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Drug Combinations |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Isoindoles |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Lactams, Macrocyclic |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Sulfonamides |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a lopinavir-ritonavir drug combination |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Lopinavir |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a 2494G1JF75 |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a danoprevir |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a 911Z9PCQ5F |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Proline |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a 9DLQ4CIU6V |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Ritonavir |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a O3J8G9O825 |2 NLM | |
700 | 1 | |a Wang, Shumei |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Tu, Xianglin |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Peng, Xuping |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Huang, Yanxia |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Wang, Li |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Ju, Weihua |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Rao, Jianfeng |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Li, Xue |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Zhu, Donghong |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Sun, Huabao |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Chen, Hongyi |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of medical virology |d 1990 |g 92(2020), 11 vom: 01. Nov., Seite 2631-2636 |w (DE-627)NLM000285676 |x 1096-9071 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:92 |g year:2020 |g number:11 |g day:01 |g month:11 |g pages:2631-2636 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmv.26141 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 92 |j 2020 |e 11 |b 01 |c 11 |h 2631-2636 |