EGFR mutation testing and treatment decisions in patients progressing on first- or second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors
BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to investigate real-world EGFR mutation testing in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) upon progression on first-/second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), and subsequent treatments received.
METHODS: Flatiron Health electronic health records-derived database was used to identify adult patients with metastatic NSCLC treated with first-/second-generation EGFR-TKI from 11/2015-09/2017, with start of first EGFR-TKI defined as the index date. Patients were stratified by receipt of EGFR-TKI as first-line (1 L) or later-line (2 L+) treatment. Mutation testing and subsequent therapies following first-/second-generation EGFR-TKI were described.
RESULTS: Overall, 782 patients (1 L = 435; 2 L+ =347) were included. Median age was 69.0 years, 63.6% were female, 56.3% were white, 87.1% were treated in community-based practices, and 30.1% of patients died during the study period; median follow-up was 309.0 days. Among the 294 (1 L = 160; 2L+ =134) patients who received subsequent therapies, treatments included chemotherapy only (1 L = 15.6%; 2L+ =21.6%), immunotherapy only (1 L = 13.8%; 2 L+ =41.0%), and targeted therapies (1 L = 70.0%; 2 L+ =36.6%). Specifically, 40 (25.0%) 1 L patients and 7 (5.2%) 2 L+ patients received osimertinib as subsequent therapy. Before the start of subsequent therapy, EGFR T790M resistance mutation testing was performed in 88 (29.9%) patients (1 L = 63 [39.4%]; 2 L+ =25 [18.7%]). Of these patients, 25 (28.4%) were T790M positive, among whom 24 (96.0%) received osimertinib.
CONCLUSIONS: A third of patients received subsequent therapies on disease progression; only 30% of these were tested for EGFR-TKI resistance mutation, prior to receiving subsequent therapies. These results highlight the importance of choosing treatments in the 1 L setting that optimize benefits for patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2020 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2020 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:20 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
BMC cancer - 20(2020), 1 vom: 28. Apr., Seite 356 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Chiang, Anne C [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Biomarkers, Tumor |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 02.02.2021 Date Revised 19.09.2021 published: Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1186/s12885-020-06826-0 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM309292026 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM309292026 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231225133603.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231225s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1186/s12885-020-06826-0 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1030.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM309292026 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)32345265 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Chiang, Anne C |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a EGFR mutation testing and treatment decisions in patients progressing on first- or second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 02.02.2021 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 19.09.2021 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to investigate real-world EGFR mutation testing in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) upon progression on first-/second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), and subsequent treatments received | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: Flatiron Health electronic health records-derived database was used to identify adult patients with metastatic NSCLC treated with first-/second-generation EGFR-TKI from 11/2015-09/2017, with start of first EGFR-TKI defined as the index date. Patients were stratified by receipt of EGFR-TKI as first-line (1 L) or later-line (2 L+) treatment. Mutation testing and subsequent therapies following first-/second-generation EGFR-TKI were described | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: Overall, 782 patients (1 L = 435; 2 L+ =347) were included. Median age was 69.0 years, 63.6% were female, 56.3% were white, 87.1% were treated in community-based practices, and 30.1% of patients died during the study period; median follow-up was 309.0 days. Among the 294 (1 L = 160; 2L+ =134) patients who received subsequent therapies, treatments included chemotherapy only (1 L = 15.6%; 2L+ =21.6%), immunotherapy only (1 L = 13.8%; 2 L+ =41.0%), and targeted therapies (1 L = 70.0%; 2 L+ =36.6%). Specifically, 40 (25.0%) 1 L patients and 7 (5.2%) 2 L+ patients received osimertinib as subsequent therapy. Before the start of subsequent therapy, EGFR T790M resistance mutation testing was performed in 88 (29.9%) patients (1 L = 63 [39.4%]; 2 L+ =25 [18.7%]). Of these patients, 25 (28.4%) were T790M positive, among whom 24 (96.0%) received osimertinib | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: A third of patients received subsequent therapies on disease progression; only 30% of these were tested for EGFR-TKI resistance mutation, prior to receiving subsequent therapies. These results highlight the importance of choosing treatments in the 1 L setting that optimize benefits for patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a EGFR mutation testing | |
| 650 | 4 | |a EGFR-TKI | |
| 650 | 4 | |a NSCLC | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Real-world | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Treatment patterns | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Biomarkers, Tumor |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Protein Kinase Inhibitors |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a EGFR protein, human |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a EC 2.7.10.1 |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a ErbB Receptors |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a EC 2.7.10.1 |2 NLM | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Fernandes, Ancilla W |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Pavilack, Melissa |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wu, Jennifer W |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Laliberté, François |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Duh, Mei Sheng |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Chehab, Nabil |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Subramanian, Janakiraman |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t BMC cancer |d 2001 |g 20(2020), 1 vom: 28. Apr., Seite 356 |w (DE-627)NLM111431948 |x 1471-2407 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:20 |g year:2020 |g number:1 |g day:28 |g month:04 |g pages:356 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-06826-0 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 20 |j 2020 |e 1 |b 28 |c 04 |h 356 | ||