Could Bladder Multiparametric MRI Be Introduced in Routine Clinical Practice? Role of the New VI-RADS Score : Results From a Prospective Study
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved..
BACKGROUND: The Vesical Imaging Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) was recently introduced as a standardized approach to reporting multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for bladder cancer. We aimed to prospectively analyze its routine use and its diagnostic performance in discriminating non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) and muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC).
PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 38 patients with diagnosis of suspect bladder cancer at cystoscopy underwent bladder mpMRI before transurethral resection of the bladder (TURB). Bladder tumors were categorized according to the VI-RADS. After TURB, the VI-RADS score was compared with histological report for each lesion separately. Receiving operating characteristic and decision curve analyses were used to assess its accuracy and clinical utility.
RESULTS: A total of 68 lesions were included, of which 7 (10.3%) were MIBC. The pooled accuracy was 90.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 75.4%-98.7%). The best threshold was estimated as VI-RADS 4, showing a sensitivity of 85.7% (95% CI, 57.1%-100%) and a specificity of 86.9% (95% CI, 78.7%-95.1%). Decision curve analyses showed that using VI-RADS ≥4 improved the net benefit compared with any default strategy for threshold probabilities of MIBC up to ∼40%, which is a reasonable clinical threshold for planning further treatments.
CONCLUSIONS: Our prospective study shows that the use of VI-RADS as a standardized reporting method is appealing and could be considered in clinical practice owing to its high accuracy.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2020 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2020 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:18 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Clinical genitourinary cancer - 18(2020), 5 vom: 28. Okt., Seite 409-415.e1 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Marchioni, Michele [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
Bladder cancer |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 18.08.2021 Date Revised 18.08.2021 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1016/j.clgc.2020.03.002 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM308583817 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM308583817 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231225132035.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231225s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.clgc.2020.03.002 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1028.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM308583817 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)32273236 | ||
035 | |a (PII)S1558-7673(20)30051-3 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Marchioni, Michele |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Could Bladder Multiparametric MRI Be Introduced in Routine Clinical Practice? Role of the New VI-RADS Score |b Results From a Prospective Study |
264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 18.08.2021 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 18.08.2021 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. | ||
520 | |a BACKGROUND: The Vesical Imaging Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) was recently introduced as a standardized approach to reporting multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for bladder cancer. We aimed to prospectively analyze its routine use and its diagnostic performance in discriminating non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) and muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) | ||
520 | |a PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 38 patients with diagnosis of suspect bladder cancer at cystoscopy underwent bladder mpMRI before transurethral resection of the bladder (TURB). Bladder tumors were categorized according to the VI-RADS. After TURB, the VI-RADS score was compared with histological report for each lesion separately. Receiving operating characteristic and decision curve analyses were used to assess its accuracy and clinical utility | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: A total of 68 lesions were included, of which 7 (10.3%) were MIBC. The pooled accuracy was 90.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 75.4%-98.7%). The best threshold was estimated as VI-RADS 4, showing a sensitivity of 85.7% (95% CI, 57.1%-100%) and a specificity of 86.9% (95% CI, 78.7%-95.1%). Decision curve analyses showed that using VI-RADS ≥4 improved the net benefit compared with any default strategy for threshold probabilities of MIBC up to ∼40%, which is a reasonable clinical threshold for planning further treatments | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: Our prospective study shows that the use of VI-RADS as a standardized reporting method is appealing and could be considered in clinical practice owing to its high accuracy | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Bladder cancer | |
650 | 4 | |a Bladder diagnostic | |
650 | 4 | |a Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of bladder | |
650 | 4 | |a Muscle invasive bladder cancer | |
650 | 4 | |a VI-RADS score | |
700 | 1 | |a Primiceri, Giulia |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Delli Pizzi, Andrea |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Basilico, Raffaella |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Berardinelli, Francesco |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Mincuzzi, Erica |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Castellucci, Roberto |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Sessa, Barbara |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Di Nicola, Marta |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Schips, Luigi |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Clinical genitourinary cancer |d 2005 |g 18(2020), 5 vom: 28. Okt., Seite 409-415.e1 |w (DE-627)NLM160229936 |x 1938-0682 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:18 |g year:2020 |g number:5 |g day:28 |g month:10 |g pages:409-415.e1 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clgc.2020.03.002 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 18 |j 2020 |e 5 |b 28 |c 10 |h 409-415.e1 |