Impact of partial nephrectomy in a hybrid operating room on the activity of kidney cancer surgery
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved..
INTRODUCTION: Partial nephrectomy (NP) after embolization of tumor vessels (NPESH) in a hybrid room combines embolization of tumor vessels and enucleation of the tumor under laparoscopy in the same operative time. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of the use of NPESH in the management of patients treated with surgery for a localized kidney tumor.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Using the uroCCR database, we included all consecutive patients operated in a university hospital for localized kidney tumor. From 2011 to May 2015, patients were treated by Standard Partial Nephrectomy (NPS) Laparoscopic or Open and from May 2015 to May 2019 by NPESH. We evaluated characteristics of patients, tumors, perioperative data and complications. These data were compared by Student and Khi2 tests.
RESULTS: 87 NPS were performed during Period 1 and 137 NPS were performed during period 2. The ASA score of patients undergoing NPESH was higher than NPS (P<0.0001). The tumor complexity and median tumor size were similar in the two groups (P=0.852 and P=0.48). The complication rate for NPS and NPESH was 55.2% and 33.6% (P=0.002). There were less severe complications in the NEPSH group (P=0.012). The median length of stay was 8 and 4 days for the NPS and NPESH groups (P<0.0001). Positive surgical margins were 2 (2.3%) and 6 (4.6%) for the NPS and NPESH group (P=0.713).
DISCUSSION: NPESH is an efficient technique compared to NPS. It seems to be an interesting alternative to limit renal ischemia, complication rate and length of stay for the management of localized kidney tumors.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2020 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2020 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:30 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Progres en urologie : journal de l'Association francaise d'urologie et de la Societe francaise d'urologie - 30(2020), 5 vom: 01. Apr., Seite 288-295 |
| Sprache: |
Französisch |
|---|
| Weiterer Titel: |
Évaluation de l’utilisation de la salle hybride sur l’activité de chirurgie en cancérologie rénale |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Aubert, C [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Cancer du rein |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 11.05.2021 Date Revised 11.05.2021 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1016/j.purol.2020.02.003 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM308199952 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM308199952 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231225131229.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231225s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||fre c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.purol.2020.02.003 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1027.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM308199952 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)32234422 | ||
| 035 | |a (PII)S1166-7087(20)30031-2 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a fre | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Aubert, C |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Impact of partial nephrectomy in a hybrid operating room on the activity of kidney cancer surgery |
| 246 | 3 | 3 | |a Évaluation de l’utilisation de la salle hybride sur l’activité de chirurgie en cancérologie rénale |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 11.05.2021 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 11.05.2021 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved. | ||
| 520 | |a INTRODUCTION: Partial nephrectomy (NP) after embolization of tumor vessels (NPESH) in a hybrid room combines embolization of tumor vessels and enucleation of the tumor under laparoscopy in the same operative time. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of the use of NPESH in the management of patients treated with surgery for a localized kidney tumor | ||
| 520 | |a MATERIAL AND METHODS: Using the uroCCR database, we included all consecutive patients operated in a university hospital for localized kidney tumor. From 2011 to May 2015, patients were treated by Standard Partial Nephrectomy (NPS) Laparoscopic or Open and from May 2015 to May 2019 by NPESH. We evaluated characteristics of patients, tumors, perioperative data and complications. These data were compared by Student and Khi2 tests | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: 87 NPS were performed during Period 1 and 137 NPS were performed during period 2. The ASA score of patients undergoing NPESH was higher than NPS (P<0.0001). The tumor complexity and median tumor size were similar in the two groups (P=0.852 and P=0.48). The complication rate for NPS and NPESH was 55.2% and 33.6% (P=0.002). There were less severe complications in the NEPSH group (P=0.012). The median length of stay was 8 and 4 days for the NPS and NPESH groups (P<0.0001). Positive surgical margins were 2 (2.3%) and 6 (4.6%) for the NPS and NPESH group (P=0.713) | ||
| 520 | |a DISCUSSION: NPESH is an efficient technique compared to NPS. It seems to be an interesting alternative to limit renal ischemia, complication rate and length of stay for the management of localized kidney tumors | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Cancer du rein | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Hybrid operating room | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Nephrectomy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Néphrectomie | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Néphrectomie partielle | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Partial neprechtomy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Renal cell carcinoma | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Salle hybride | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Rolley, C |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Mauny, M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Heuveline, J |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Silve, E |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Humeau, M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Le Corre, V |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lebdai, S |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Brassart, E |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Culty, T |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Baize, N |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Rousselet, M C |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Nedelcu, C |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Aubé, C |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Bouvier, A |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Bigot, P |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Progres en urologie : journal de l'Association francaise d'urologie et de la Societe francaise d'urologie |d 1997 |g 30(2020), 5 vom: 01. Apr., Seite 288-295 |w (DE-627)NLM012649481 |x 1166-7087 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:30 |g year:2020 |g number:5 |g day:01 |g month:04 |g pages:288-295 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.purol.2020.02.003 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 30 |j 2020 |e 5 |b 01 |c 04 |h 288-295 | ||