Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Medial Prefrontal Cortex Has No Specific Effect on Self-referential Processes
Copyright © 2020 Mainz, Britz, Forster, Drüke and Gauggel..
The processing of self-referential information can be influenced by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). The present randomized controlled study investigated whether similar effects can be elicited through the application of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) regarding the "self-serving bias" (SSB) and the "mnemic neglect effect" (MNE). Seventy-five healthy males (M age = 25; SD = 4.3) were investigated in a between-groups design with random assignment by applying anodal, cathodal, or sham tDCS to the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC). After stimulation, the participants judged if 80 personality traits (40 positive, 40 negative) were self-descriptive or not. Finally, the participants had to recall the previously presented adjectives. All three stimulation groups showed the expected SSB and MNE. Still, and contrary to our hypotheses, tDCS revealed neither a significant interaction effect between groups and valence concerning the number of chosen self-referential traits (F (2,72) = 1.36, p = 0.26, η G 2 = 0.02) nor an interaction effect between groups, valence, and self-reference concerning the percentage of recalled words (F (2,71) = 0.69, p = 0.50, η G 2 = 0.01). However, a post hoc inspection of effect sizes revealed that less negative traits were indicated as self-referential in the anodal compared to the cathodal group (ES: -0.59; CI: -1.16 to -0.03). Moreover, the participants showed-regardless of self-reference and type of stimulation-a better recall with tDCS in comparison to sham stimulation. Our results indicate that tDCS of the mPFC in healthy young men has no influence on the SSB and the MNE. However, tDCS seems to improve memory performance.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2020 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2020 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:14 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Frontiers in human neuroscience - 14(2020) vom: 03., Seite 56 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Mainz, Verena [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
Information processing |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Revised 28.03.2024 published: Electronic-eCollection Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.3389/fnhum.2020.00056 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM308045424 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM308045424 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240328233931.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231225s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00056 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1352.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM308045424 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)32218726 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Mainz, Verena |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Medial Prefrontal Cortex Has No Specific Effect on Self-referential Processes |
264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 28.03.2024 | ||
500 | |a published: Electronic-eCollection | ||
500 | |a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a Copyright © 2020 Mainz, Britz, Forster, Drüke and Gauggel. | ||
520 | |a The processing of self-referential information can be influenced by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). The present randomized controlled study investigated whether similar effects can be elicited through the application of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) regarding the "self-serving bias" (SSB) and the "mnemic neglect effect" (MNE). Seventy-five healthy males (M age = 25; SD = 4.3) were investigated in a between-groups design with random assignment by applying anodal, cathodal, or sham tDCS to the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC). After stimulation, the participants judged if 80 personality traits (40 positive, 40 negative) were self-descriptive or not. Finally, the participants had to recall the previously presented adjectives. All three stimulation groups showed the expected SSB and MNE. Still, and contrary to our hypotheses, tDCS revealed neither a significant interaction effect between groups and valence concerning the number of chosen self-referential traits (F (2,72) = 1.36, p = 0.26, η G 2 = 0.02) nor an interaction effect between groups, valence, and self-reference concerning the percentage of recalled words (F (2,71) = 0.69, p = 0.50, η G 2 = 0.01). However, a post hoc inspection of effect sizes revealed that less negative traits were indicated as self-referential in the anodal compared to the cathodal group (ES: -0.59; CI: -1.16 to -0.03). Moreover, the participants showed-regardless of self-reference and type of stimulation-a better recall with tDCS in comparison to sham stimulation. Our results indicate that tDCS of the mPFC in healthy young men has no influence on the SSB and the MNE. However, tDCS seems to improve memory performance | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a information processing | |
650 | 4 | |a medial prefrontal cortex | |
650 | 4 | |a menmic neglect effect | |
650 | 4 | |a self-serving bias | |
650 | 4 | |a transcranial direct current stimulation | |
700 | 1 | |a Britz, Sara |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Forster, Saskia Doreen |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Drüke, Barbara |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Gauggel, Siegfried |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Frontiers in human neuroscience |d 2007 |g 14(2020) vom: 03., Seite 56 |w (DE-627)NLM184031621 |x 1662-5161 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:14 |g year:2020 |g day:03 |g pages:56 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00056 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 14 |j 2020 |b 03 |h 56 |