Working Memory, Processing Speed, and Memory Functioning Are Minimally Predictive of Victoria Symptom Validity Test Performance
A sound performance validity test is accurate for detecting invalid neuropsychological test performance and relatively insensitive to actual cognitive ability or impairment. This study explored the relationship of several cognitive abilities to several performance indices on the Victoria Symptom Validity Test (VSVT), including accuracy and response latency. This cross-sectional study examined data from a mixed clinical sample of 88 adults identified as having valid neurocognitive test profiles via independent validity measures, and who completed the VSVT along with objective measures of working memory, processing speed, and verbal memory during their clinical neuropsychological evaluation. Results of linear regression analyses indicated that cognitive test performance accounted for 5% to 14% of total variance for VSVT performance across indices. Working memory was the only cognitive ability to predict significant, albeit minimal, variance on the VSVT response accuracy indices. Results show that VSVT performance is minimally predicted by working memory, processing speed, or delayed verbal memory recall.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2021 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2021 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:28 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Assessment - 28(2021), 6 vom: 01. Sept., Seite 1614-1623 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Resch, Zachary J [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Assessment |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 08.09.2021 Date Revised 08.09.2021 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1177/1073191120911102 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM307620921 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM307620921 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231225125949.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231225s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1177/1073191120911102 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1025.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM307620921 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)32174137 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Resch, Zachary J |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Working Memory, Processing Speed, and Memory Functioning Are Minimally Predictive of Victoria Symptom Validity Test Performance |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 08.09.2021 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 08.09.2021 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a A sound performance validity test is accurate for detecting invalid neuropsychological test performance and relatively insensitive to actual cognitive ability or impairment. This study explored the relationship of several cognitive abilities to several performance indices on the Victoria Symptom Validity Test (VSVT), including accuracy and response latency. This cross-sectional study examined data from a mixed clinical sample of 88 adults identified as having valid neurocognitive test profiles via independent validity measures, and who completed the VSVT along with objective measures of working memory, processing speed, and verbal memory during their clinical neuropsychological evaluation. Results of linear regression analyses indicated that cognitive test performance accounted for 5% to 14% of total variance for VSVT performance across indices. Working memory was the only cognitive ability to predict significant, albeit minimal, variance on the VSVT response accuracy indices. Results show that VSVT performance is minimally predicted by working memory, processing speed, or delayed verbal memory recall | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a assessment | |
| 650 | 4 | |a cognition | |
| 650 | 4 | |a effort | |
| 650 | 4 | |a neuropsychology | |
| 650 | 4 | |a performance validity test | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Soble, Jason R |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ovsiew, Gabriel P |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Castillo, Liliam R |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Saladino, Kevin F |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a DeDios-Stern, Samantha |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Schulze, Evan T |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Song, Woojin |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Pliskin, Neil H |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Assessment |d 1994 |g 28(2021), 6 vom: 01. Sept., Seite 1614-1623 |w (DE-627)NLM093746261 |x 1552-3489 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:28 |g year:2021 |g number:6 |g day:01 |g month:09 |g pages:1614-1623 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1073191120911102 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 28 |j 2021 |e 6 |b 01 |c 09 |h 1614-1623 | ||