Who decides? Shared decision-making among colorectal cancer surgery patients in China
PURPOSE: Patient-centered care (PCC) and shared decision-making (SDM) is advised within the English medical literature for its positive impact. The benefits of such approaches are said to foster increased trust, patient decision satisfaction, and even better outcomes. Looking at a Chinese cancer hospital, this research sought to understand how surgical decision-making was made among colorectal cancer patients.
METHODS: Observations (n = 36) and semi-structured interviews (n = 24) were conducted with patients and family members.
RESULTS: In the observations, 69.4% of the participating families made the decision to undergo surgery at the end of the consultation. In the interviews, three main themes emerged in regard to the characteristics in the family decision-making model, and they included three structural elements: the patient's sick role, family functional structure, and control of information.
CONCLUSION: This study showed that the Chinese decision-making model is different from the western SDM model. In the Chinese context, family members dominated the decision-making process which raised concerns around informed consent. This may benefit patients insofar as receiving timely treatment in the short term but at the same time may be at the expense of limiting patient's autonomy. The promotion of a new model or a model encompassing family-centered care values may be more appropriate in clinical practice in China that can address the issues around informed consent.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2020 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2020 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:28 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer - 28(2020), 11 vom: 17. Nov., Seite 5353-5361 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Zhai, Huiwen [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
China |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 30.10.2020 Date Revised 28.12.2020 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1007/s00520-020-05391-3 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM30724590X |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM30724590X | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231225125138.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231225s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s00520-020-05391-3 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1024.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM30724590X | ||
035 | |a (NLM)32133543 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Zhai, Huiwen |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Who decides? Shared decision-making among colorectal cancer surgery patients in China |
264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 30.10.2020 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 28.12.2020 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a PURPOSE: Patient-centered care (PCC) and shared decision-making (SDM) is advised within the English medical literature for its positive impact. The benefits of such approaches are said to foster increased trust, patient decision satisfaction, and even better outcomes. Looking at a Chinese cancer hospital, this research sought to understand how surgical decision-making was made among colorectal cancer patients | ||
520 | |a METHODS: Observations (n = 36) and semi-structured interviews (n = 24) were conducted with patients and family members | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: In the observations, 69.4% of the participating families made the decision to undergo surgery at the end of the consultation. In the interviews, three main themes emerged in regard to the characteristics in the family decision-making model, and they included three structural elements: the patient's sick role, family functional structure, and control of information | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSION: This study showed that the Chinese decision-making model is different from the western SDM model. In the Chinese context, family members dominated the decision-making process which raised concerns around informed consent. This may benefit patients insofar as receiving timely treatment in the short term but at the same time may be at the expense of limiting patient's autonomy. The promotion of a new model or a model encompassing family-centered care values may be more appropriate in clinical practice in China that can address the issues around informed consent | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Observational Study | |
650 | 4 | |a China | |
650 | 4 | |a Cultural issues | |
650 | 4 | |a Family | |
650 | 4 | |a Shared decision-making | |
700 | 1 | |a Lavender, Christopher |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Li, Cong |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Wu, Haotan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Gong, Ni |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Cheng, Yu |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer |d 1994 |g 28(2020), 11 vom: 17. Nov., Seite 5353-5361 |w (DE-627)NLM07487618X |x 1433-7339 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:28 |g year:2020 |g number:11 |g day:17 |g month:11 |g pages:5353-5361 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-020-05391-3 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 28 |j 2020 |e 11 |b 17 |c 11 |h 5353-5361 |