Comparison of Reduced-Port Robotic Surgery (RPRS) with conventional 2 port laparoscopy for myomectomy
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved..
OBJECTIVE: To compare the surgical outcomes between Reduced-Port Robotic Surgery (RPRS) using the Octo-Port system and conventional 2 port laparoscopy for myomectomy.
STUDY DESIGN: This is a prospective, non-randomized study, which compared and analyzed data from 41 patients who underwent RPRS myomectomy and 22 patients who underwent conventional 2 port laparoscopic myomectomy from April 2016 through July 2019. We compared the myoma enucleation time, suture time, myoma type, and the location of the largest myoma between the two groups.
RESULTS: The patients were not different between the two groups. The myoma enucleation time (26.7 ± 20.9 vs. 22.0 ± 13.7, p = 0.380), hemoglobin drop (2.38 ± 0.9 vs 2.1 ± 0.8, p = 0.280), weight of the myomas (205.3 ± 161.5 vs. 163.4 ± 89.1, p = 0.261), and estimated blood loss (181.1 ± 163.4 vs. 187.3 ± 77.5, p = 0.840) were not significantly different between the two groups. Notably, only the suture time (15.5 (10-21.5) vs. 20 (18-27), p = 0.005) was lesser in women who underwent RPRS myomectomy than in those who underwent conventional 2 port myomectomy.
CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that RPRS myomectomy is comparable to conventional 2 port laparoscopic myomectomy in terms of safety and feasibility and may be more advantageous for suturing after myoma enucleation.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2020 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2020 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:247 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology - 247(2020) vom: 18. Apr., Seite 181-185 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Lee, Nae Hyun [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
2-Port laparoscopic myomectomy |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 10.12.2020 Date Revised 14.12.2020 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.02.035 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM30711984X |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM30711984X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231225124848.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231225s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.02.035 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1023.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM30711984X | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)32120179 | ||
| 035 | |a (PII)S0301-2115(20)30103-2 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Lee, Nae Hyun |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Comparison of Reduced-Port Robotic Surgery (RPRS) with conventional 2 port laparoscopy for myomectomy |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 10.12.2020 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 14.12.2020 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. | ||
| 520 | |a OBJECTIVE: To compare the surgical outcomes between Reduced-Port Robotic Surgery (RPRS) using the Octo-Port system and conventional 2 port laparoscopy for myomectomy | ||
| 520 | |a STUDY DESIGN: This is a prospective, non-randomized study, which compared and analyzed data from 41 patients who underwent RPRS myomectomy and 22 patients who underwent conventional 2 port laparoscopic myomectomy from April 2016 through July 2019. We compared the myoma enucleation time, suture time, myoma type, and the location of the largest myoma between the two groups | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: The patients were not different between the two groups. The myoma enucleation time (26.7 ± 20.9 vs. 22.0 ± 13.7, p = 0.380), hemoglobin drop (2.38 ± 0.9 vs 2.1 ± 0.8, p = 0.280), weight of the myomas (205.3 ± 161.5 vs. 163.4 ± 89.1, p = 0.261), and estimated blood loss (181.1 ± 163.4 vs. 187.3 ± 77.5, p = 0.840) were not significantly different between the two groups. Notably, only the suture time (15.5 (10-21.5) vs. 20 (18-27), p = 0.005) was lesser in women who underwent RPRS myomectomy than in those who underwent conventional 2 port myomectomy | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that RPRS myomectomy is comparable to conventional 2 port laparoscopic myomectomy in terms of safety and feasibility and may be more advantageous for suturing after myoma enucleation | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Comparative Study | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a 2-Port laparoscopic myomectomy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a RPRS myomectomy | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lee, San Hui |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kim, Woo Young |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology |d 1974 |g 247(2020) vom: 18. Apr., Seite 181-185 |w (DE-627)NLM000469130 |x 1872-7654 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:247 |g year:2020 |g day:18 |g month:04 |g pages:181-185 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.02.035 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 247 |j 2020 |b 18 |c 04 |h 181-185 | ||