Research Consent Models Used in Prospective Studies of Neurologically Deceased Organ Donors : A Systematic Review
Research to inform the care of neurologically deceased organ donors is complicated by a lack of standards for research consent. In this systematic review, we aim to describe current practices of soliciting consent for participation in prospective studies of neurologically deceased donors, including the frequency and justification for these various models of consent. Among the 74 studies included, 14 did not report on any regulatory review, and 13 did not report on the study consent procedures. Of the remaining 47 studies, 24 utilized a waiver of research consent. The most common justification for a waiver of research consent related to the fact that neurologically deceased donors are not considered human subjects. In conclusion, among studies of neurologically deceased donors, research consent models vary and are inconsistently reported. Consensus and standardization in the application of research consent models will help to advance this emerging field of research.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2020 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2020 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:15 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE - 15(2020), 4 vom: 06. Okt., Seite 244-251 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
D'Aragon, Frederick [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Donor intervention |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 17.09.2021 Date Revised 17.09.2021 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1177/1556264620904627 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM306469812 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM306469812 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231225123432.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231225s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1177/1556264620904627 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1021.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM306469812 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)32052700 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a D'Aragon, Frederick |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Research Consent Models Used in Prospective Studies of Neurologically Deceased Organ Donors |b A Systematic Review |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 17.09.2021 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 17.09.2021 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a Research to inform the care of neurologically deceased organ donors is complicated by a lack of standards for research consent. In this systematic review, we aim to describe current practices of soliciting consent for participation in prospective studies of neurologically deceased donors, including the frequency and justification for these various models of consent. Among the 74 studies included, 14 did not report on any regulatory review, and 13 did not report on the study consent procedures. Of the remaining 47 studies, 24 utilized a waiver of research consent. The most common justification for a waiver of research consent related to the fact that neurologically deceased donors are not considered human subjects. In conclusion, among studies of neurologically deceased donors, research consent models vary and are inconsistently reported. Consensus and standardization in the application of research consent models will help to advance this emerging field of research | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Systematic Review | |
| 650 | 4 | |a donor intervention | |
| 650 | 4 | |a organ donation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a research consent | |
| 650 | 4 | |a transplantation | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Burns, Karen E A |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Yaworski, Amanda |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lucas, Amanda |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Arseneau, Erika |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Belley-Cote, Emilie |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Dhanani, Sonny |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Frenette, Anne-Julie |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lamontagne, François |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lauzier, François |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Akhtar, Aemal |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Oczkowski, Simon |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Rochwerg, Bram |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Meade, Maureen O |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE |d 2006 |g 15(2020), 4 vom: 06. Okt., Seite 244-251 |w (DE-627)NLM163844968 |x 1556-2654 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:15 |g year:2020 |g number:4 |g day:06 |g month:10 |g pages:244-251 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1556264620904627 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 15 |j 2020 |e 4 |b 06 |c 10 |h 244-251 | ||