Short-term outcomes and prognosis of laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy in elderly patients with stomach cancer
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the short-term outcomes and prognosis of laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy (LTG) in elderly patients with gastric cancer.
METHODS: The clinical data of 275 patients aged over 65 years undergoing open total gastrectomy (OTG, n = 184) or laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy (LTG, n = 91) were reviewed from January 2015 to August 2017 at the First Affiliated Hospital of the University of Science and Technology of China. Short-term outcomes were compared between the two groups, and risk factors for postoperative complications were explored. In addition, the 2-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were investigated for both groups.
RESULTS: Except for the ASA score (P = 0.01), there was no significant difference regarding patient baselines between the two groups. Patients in the LTG group had a longer operative time (P < 0.001), less intraoperative blood loss (P = 0.004), a shorter time of resumption to a semi-liquid diet (P < 0.001) and a shorter postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.001). The incidence of pulmonary complications was significantly lower in the LTG group than in the OTG group (4.4% vs. 13%, P = 0.026). The number of lymph nodes harvested in the LTG group was higher than that in the OTG group (20.7 ± 7.4 vs. 17.5 ± 6.9, P = 0.001), and the proportion of patients with TNM stage III gastric cancer was higher in the LTG group than in the OTG group (P = 0.035). There was no significant difference in the 2-year OS rate or 2-year DFS rate between the two groups (P = 0.057 and P = 0.344). Sex, age, preoperative comorbidity, intraoperative blood loss, and TNM stage were identified as independent prognostic factors for postoperative survival.
CONCLUSION: Comparing with OTG, LTG is feasible and contributes to less surgical trauma and a faster recovery after total gastrectomy. In addition, LTG contributes to a lower risk of postoperative pulmonary complications. Regarding oncological results, LTG is more effective for lymph node dissection and has a comparable long-term prognosis as OTG.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2020 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2020 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:34 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Surgical endoscopy - 34(2020), 12 vom: 28. Dez., Seite 5428-5438 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Liu, Dongliang [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
Elderly patients |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 28.05.2021 Date Revised 28.05.2021 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1007/s00464-019-07338-0 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM305898779 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM305898779 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231225122156.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231225s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s00464-019-07338-0 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1019.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM305898779 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)31993813 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Liu, Dongliang |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Short-term outcomes and prognosis of laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy in elderly patients with stomach cancer |
264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 28.05.2021 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 28.05.2021 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the short-term outcomes and prognosis of laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy (LTG) in elderly patients with gastric cancer | ||
520 | |a METHODS: The clinical data of 275 patients aged over 65 years undergoing open total gastrectomy (OTG, n = 184) or laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy (LTG, n = 91) were reviewed from January 2015 to August 2017 at the First Affiliated Hospital of the University of Science and Technology of China. Short-term outcomes were compared between the two groups, and risk factors for postoperative complications were explored. In addition, the 2-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were investigated for both groups | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: Except for the ASA score (P = 0.01), there was no significant difference regarding patient baselines between the two groups. Patients in the LTG group had a longer operative time (P < 0.001), less intraoperative blood loss (P = 0.004), a shorter time of resumption to a semi-liquid diet (P < 0.001) and a shorter postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.001). The incidence of pulmonary complications was significantly lower in the LTG group than in the OTG group (4.4% vs. 13%, P = 0.026). The number of lymph nodes harvested in the LTG group was higher than that in the OTG group (20.7 ± 7.4 vs. 17.5 ± 6.9, P = 0.001), and the proportion of patients with TNM stage III gastric cancer was higher in the LTG group than in the OTG group (P = 0.035). There was no significant difference in the 2-year OS rate or 2-year DFS rate between the two groups (P = 0.057 and P = 0.344). Sex, age, preoperative comorbidity, intraoperative blood loss, and TNM stage were identified as independent prognostic factors for postoperative survival | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSION: Comparing with OTG, LTG is feasible and contributes to less surgical trauma and a faster recovery after total gastrectomy. In addition, LTG contributes to a lower risk of postoperative pulmonary complications. Regarding oncological results, LTG is more effective for lymph node dissection and has a comparable long-term prognosis as OTG | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't | |
650 | 4 | |a Elderly patients | |
650 | 4 | |a Gastric cancer | |
650 | 4 | |a Laparoscopy-assisted surgery | |
650 | 4 | |a Open surgery | |
650 | 4 | |a Total gastrectomy | |
700 | 1 | |a Liang, Lichuan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Liu, Liu |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Zhu, Zhiqiang |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Liu, Shaojun |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Hu, Lei |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a He, Yiren |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Fang, Yu |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Wan, Xiao |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Surgical endoscopy |d 1996 |g 34(2020), 12 vom: 28. Dez., Seite 5428-5438 |w (DE-627)NLM012660159 |x 1432-2218 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:34 |g year:2020 |g number:12 |g day:28 |g month:12 |g pages:5428-5438 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07338-0 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 34 |j 2020 |e 12 |b 28 |c 12 |h 5428-5438 |