Timing of initiation of renal replacement therapy in acute kidney injury : an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Purpose: The results from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) concerning the timing of initiation of renal replacement therapy (RRT) for patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) are still inconsistent.Materials and methods: We searched for RCTs, as well as relevant references, focusing on the timing of RRT for AKI patients in the Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar and Chinese databases from their inception to December 2018.Results: We included 18 RCTs from 1997 to 2018 involving 2856 patients. Pooled analyses of all RCTs showed no significant difference in mortality between early initiation and delayed initiation of RRT (RR 0.98, 95% CI: 0.89 to 1.08, p = .7) (I2 = 2%), and similar results were found in critically ill and community-acquired AKI patients, as well as in a subgroup of patients with sepsis and in cardiac surgery recipients. There was also no difference in the incidence of dialysis independence (RR 0.75, 95% CI: 0.47 to 1.2, p = .2) (I2 = 0). However, an early RRT strategy was associated with a significantly higher incidence of the need for RRT for AKI patients (RR 1.24, 95% CI: 1.13 to 1.36, p < .01) (I2 = 34%).Conclusions: As no life-threatening complications occurred, there was no evidence to show any benefit of an early RRT strategy for critically ill or community-acquired AKI patients; in contrast, a delayed strategy might avert the need for RRT.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2020 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2020 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:42 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Renal failure - 42(2020), 1 vom: 28. Nov., Seite 77-88 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Zhang, Ling [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
Acute kidney injury |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 08.06.2020 Date Revised 08.06.2020 published: Print Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1080/0886022X.2019.1705337 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM304938025 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM304938025 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231225120051.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231225s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/0886022X.2019.1705337 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1016.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM304938025 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)31893969 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Zhang, Ling |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Timing of initiation of renal replacement therapy in acute kidney injury |b an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 08.06.2020 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 08.06.2020 | ||
500 | |a published: Print | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a Purpose: The results from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) concerning the timing of initiation of renal replacement therapy (RRT) for patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) are still inconsistent.Materials and methods: We searched for RCTs, as well as relevant references, focusing on the timing of RRT for AKI patients in the Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar and Chinese databases from their inception to December 2018.Results: We included 18 RCTs from 1997 to 2018 involving 2856 patients. Pooled analyses of all RCTs showed no significant difference in mortality between early initiation and delayed initiation of RRT (RR 0.98, 95% CI: 0.89 to 1.08, p = .7) (I2 = 2%), and similar results were found in critically ill and community-acquired AKI patients, as well as in a subgroup of patients with sepsis and in cardiac surgery recipients. There was also no difference in the incidence of dialysis independence (RR 0.75, 95% CI: 0.47 to 1.2, p = .2) (I2 = 0). However, an early RRT strategy was associated with a significantly higher incidence of the need for RRT for AKI patients (RR 1.24, 95% CI: 1.13 to 1.36, p < .01) (I2 = 34%).Conclusions: As no life-threatening complications occurred, there was no evidence to show any benefit of an early RRT strategy for critically ill or community-acquired AKI patients; in contrast, a delayed strategy might avert the need for RRT | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Meta-Analysis | |
650 | 4 | |a Acute kidney injury | |
650 | 4 | |a early strategy | |
650 | 4 | |a meta-analysis | |
650 | 4 | |a renal replacement therapy | |
650 | 4 | |a timing | |
700 | 1 | |a Chen, Dezheng |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Tang, Xin |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Li, Peiyun |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Zhang, Yong |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Tao, Ye |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Renal failure |d 1995 |g 42(2020), 1 vom: 28. Nov., Seite 77-88 |w (DE-627)NLM012950394 |x 1525-6049 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:42 |g year:2020 |g number:1 |g day:28 |g month:11 |g pages:77-88 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0886022X.2019.1705337 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 42 |j 2020 |e 1 |b 28 |c 11 |h 77-88 |