Upper-thoracic versus lower-thoracic upper instrumented vertebra in adult spinal deformity patients undergoing fusion to the pelvis : surgical decision-making and patient outcomes

OBJECTIVE: Optimal patient selection for upper-thoracic (UT) versus lower-thoracic (LT) fusion during adult spinal deformity (ASD) correction is challenging. Radiographic and clinical outcomes following UT versus LT fusion remain incompletely understood. The purposes of this study were: 1) to evaluate demographic, radiographic, and surgical characteristics associated with choice of UT versus LT fusion endpoint; and 2) to evaluate differences in radiographic, clinical, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes following UT versus LT fusion for ASD.

METHODS: Retrospective review of a prospectively collected multicenter ASD database was performed. Patients with ASD who underwent fusion from the sacrum/ilium to the LT (T9-L1) or UT (T1-6) spine were compared for demographic, radiographic, and surgical characteristics. Outcomes including proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK), reoperation, rod fracture, pseudarthrosis, overall complications, 2-year change in alignment parameters, and 2-year HRQOL metrics (Lumbar Stiffness Disability Index, Scoliosis Research Society-22r questionnaire, Oswestry Disability Index) were compared after controlling for confounding factors via multivariate analysis.

RESULTS: Three hundred three patients (169 LT, 134 UT) were evaluated. Independent predictors of UT fusion included greater thoracic kyphosis (odds ratio [OR] 0.97 per degree, p = 0.0098), greater coronal Cobb angle (OR 1.06 per degree, p < 0.0001), and performance of a 3-column osteotomy (3-CO; OR 2.39, p = 0.0351). While associated with longer operative times (ratio 1.13, p < 0.0001) and greater estimated blood loss (ratio 1.31, p = 0.0018), UT fusions resulted in greater sagittal vertical axis improvement (-59.5 vs -41.0 mm, p = 0.0035) and lower PJK rates (OR 0.49, p = 0.0457). No significant differences in postoperative HRQOL measures, reoperation, or overall complication rates were detected between groups (all p > 0.1).

CONCLUSIONS: Greater deformity and need for 3-CO increased the likelihood of UT fusion. Despite longer operative times and greater blood loss, UT fusions resulted in better sagittal correction and lower 2-year PJK rates following surgery for ASD. While continued surveillance is necessary, this information may inform patient counseling and surgical decision-making.

Medienart:

E-Artikel

Erscheinungsjahr:

2019

Erschienen:

2019

Enthalten in:

Zur Gesamtaufnahme - year:2019

Enthalten in:

Journal of neurosurgery. Spine - (2019) vom: 20. Dez., Seite 1-7

Sprache:

Englisch

Beteiligte Personen:

Daniels, Alan H [VerfasserIn]
Reid, Daniel B C [VerfasserIn]
Durand, Wesley M [VerfasserIn]
Hamilton, D Kojo [VerfasserIn]
Passias, Peter G [VerfasserIn]
Kim, Han Jo [VerfasserIn]
Protopsaltis, Themistocles S [VerfasserIn]
Lafage, Virginie [VerfasserIn]
Smith, Justin S [VerfasserIn]
Shaffrey, Christopher I [VerfasserIn]
Gupta, Munish [VerfasserIn]
Klineberg, Eric [VerfasserIn]
Schwab, Frank [VerfasserIn]
Burton, Douglas [VerfasserIn]
Bess, Shay [VerfasserIn]
Ames, Christopher P [VerfasserIn]
Hart, Robert A [VerfasserIn]
International Spine Study Group [VerfasserIn]

Links:

Volltext

Themen:

3-CO = 3-column osteotomy
ASA = American Society of Anesthesiologists
ASD = adult spinal deformity
Adult spinal deformity
CCI = Charlson Comorbidity Index
Complications
EBL = estimated blood loss
HRQOL = health-related quality of life
ISSG = International Spine Study Group
Journal Article
LL = lumbar lordosis
LSDI = Lumbar Stiffness Disability Index
LT = lower thoracic
Lower thoracic
ODI = Oswestry Disability Index
OR = odds ratio
Outcomes
PI = pelvic incidence
PJA = proximal junction angle
PJF = proximal junctional failure
PJK = proximal junctional kyphosis
PT = pelvic tilt
Proximal junctional kyphosis
SRS-22r = Scoliosis Research Society 22-r questionnaire
SVA = sagittal vertical axis
Scoliosis
TK = thoracic kyphosis
UIV = upper instrumented vertebra
UT = upper thoracic
Upper instrumented vertebra
Upper thoracic

Anmerkungen:

Date Revised 27.02.2024

published: Print-Electronic

Citation Status Publisher

doi:

10.3171/2019.9.SPINE19557

funding:

Förderinstitution / Projekttitel:

PPN (Katalog-ID):

NLM304612952