A Human Factors Study Using VTA for Incident Cases in Radiotherapy
In recent years, workload has increased with higher precision of radiotherapy. Although both efficiency and thoroughness of treatment are crucial, in such conditions, human error is easy to occur. In this study, five incident cases that occurred in four facilities were studied and analyzed from the viewpoint of human factors that contribute to errors using variation tree analysis. We also analyzed resilience (the ability to return to one's original state even if the system deviates from a stable state), which has attracted attention in recent safety research. There were potential factors represented by patient factors in all cases. These factors caused deviations from standard operations, and incidents occurred due to unfamiliar situations and operations. Furthermore, in four of the five cases, the cause of the incident was a resilience action or judgment that was deemed to have required "some sort of ingenuity or adjustment." It was found that human error occurred due to multiple simultaneous occurrences of potential factors, i.e., patient and human factors such as high workload, impatience, and work interruptions. A reduction in human errors can be achieved by avoiding time pressure and multitasking, creating work environment and working conditions that make resilience work well, revising ambiguous rules and procedures, and promoting standardized working methods.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2019 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2019 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:75 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi - 75(2019), 11 vom: 14., Seite 1249-1259 |
Sprache: |
Japanisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Yamamoto, Toshijiro [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
Human factors |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 30.12.2019 Date Revised 08.01.2020 published: Print Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.6009/jjrt.2019_JSRT_75.11.1249 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM303512555 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM303512555 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231225113000.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231225s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||jpn c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.6009/jjrt.2019_JSRT_75.11.1249 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1011.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM303512555 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)31748450 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a jpn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Yamamoto, Toshijiro |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 2 | |a A Human Factors Study Using VTA for Incident Cases in Radiotherapy |
264 | 1 | |c 2019 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 30.12.2019 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 08.01.2020 | ||
500 | |a published: Print | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a In recent years, workload has increased with higher precision of radiotherapy. Although both efficiency and thoroughness of treatment are crucial, in such conditions, human error is easy to occur. In this study, five incident cases that occurred in four facilities were studied and analyzed from the viewpoint of human factors that contribute to errors using variation tree analysis. We also analyzed resilience (the ability to return to one's original state even if the system deviates from a stable state), which has attracted attention in recent safety research. There were potential factors represented by patient factors in all cases. These factors caused deviations from standard operations, and incidents occurred due to unfamiliar situations and operations. Furthermore, in four of the five cases, the cause of the incident was a resilience action or judgment that was deemed to have required "some sort of ingenuity or adjustment." It was found that human error occurred due to multiple simultaneous occurrences of potential factors, i.e., patient and human factors such as high workload, impatience, and work interruptions. A reduction in human errors can be achieved by avoiding time pressure and multitasking, creating work environment and working conditions that make resilience work well, revising ambiguous rules and procedures, and promoting standardized working methods | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a human factors | |
650 | 4 | |a incident | |
650 | 4 | |a radiotherapy | |
650 | 4 | |a resilience | |
650 | 4 | |a variation tree analysis (VTA) | |
700 | 1 | |a Oka, Kohei |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi |d 1993 |g 75(2019), 11 vom: 14., Seite 1249-1259 |w (DE-627)NLM074820923 |x 1881-4883 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:75 |g year:2019 |g number:11 |g day:14 |g pages:1249-1259 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.6009/jjrt.2019_JSRT_75.11.1249 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 75 |j 2019 |e 11 |b 14 |h 1249-1259 |