Eye drop technique and patient-reported problems in a real-world population of eye drop users
OBJECTIVE: To assess eye drop technique and patient-reported problems with eye drop instillation in a primary care sample of eye drop users.
METHODS: Cross-sectional observational study in 136 community pharmacies in Belgium. Patient inclusion criteria were being age ≥ 18 years and using eye drops for ≥ 1 month (to ensure that patients were already familiar with eye drop instillation). Participants demonstrated their eye drop technique and completed a self-administered questionnaire.
RESULTS: Participants (n = 678) had a mean age of 68.9 ± 12.4 years. During the demonstration, almost everyone (98.0%) successfully instilled at least one drop in the eye, although 14% required multiple attempts to achieve this. Only 3% of the sample exhibited perfect drop technique, meaning that they performed correctly all the steps. Most common deviations were touching the bottle to the eye or eyelid (40.7% of patients), and failing to close the eye (67.8%) and perform nasolacrimal occlusion for at least 1 min (94.7%) after drop instillation. Importantly, we found that 20% of ophthalmic suspensions were not shaken before use. Forty percent of patients reported ≥ 1 problem with eye drop instillation. Most common problems were difficulties with getting a drop in the eye (18.3% of patients), too many drops coming out of the bottle (14.6%), and difficulty squeezing the bottle (12.2%). About half of the sample recalled having had education in eye drop instillation technique.
CONCLUSION: This study showed suboptimal eye drop technique in real-world clinical practice. A proactive role of community pharmacists in detecting and resolving these problems could be helpful.
Errataetall: | |
---|---|
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2020 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2020 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:34 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Eye (London, England) - 34(2020), 8 vom: 05. Aug., Seite 1392-1398 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Mehuys, Els [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 18.06.2021 Date Revised 02.08.2021 published: Print-Electronic CommentIn: Eye (Lond). 2021 Jan;35(1):356. - PMID 32139888 Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1038/s41433-019-0665-y |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM302949445 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM302949445 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231225111810.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231225s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1038/s41433-019-0665-y |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1009.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM302949445 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)31690823 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Mehuys, Els |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Eye drop technique and patient-reported problems in a real-world population of eye drop users |
264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 18.06.2021 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 02.08.2021 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a CommentIn: Eye (Lond). 2021 Jan;35(1):356. - PMID 32139888 | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a OBJECTIVE: To assess eye drop technique and patient-reported problems with eye drop instillation in a primary care sample of eye drop users | ||
520 | |a METHODS: Cross-sectional observational study in 136 community pharmacies in Belgium. Patient inclusion criteria were being age ≥ 18 years and using eye drops for ≥ 1 month (to ensure that patients were already familiar with eye drop instillation). Participants demonstrated their eye drop technique and completed a self-administered questionnaire | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: Participants (n = 678) had a mean age of 68.9 ± 12.4 years. During the demonstration, almost everyone (98.0%) successfully instilled at least one drop in the eye, although 14% required multiple attempts to achieve this. Only 3% of the sample exhibited perfect drop technique, meaning that they performed correctly all the steps. Most common deviations were touching the bottle to the eye or eyelid (40.7% of patients), and failing to close the eye (67.8%) and perform nasolacrimal occlusion for at least 1 min (94.7%) after drop instillation. Importantly, we found that 20% of ophthalmic suspensions were not shaken before use. Forty percent of patients reported ≥ 1 problem with eye drop instillation. Most common problems were difficulties with getting a drop in the eye (18.3% of patients), too many drops coming out of the bottle (14.6%), and difficulty squeezing the bottle (12.2%). About half of the sample recalled having had education in eye drop instillation technique | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSION: This study showed suboptimal eye drop technique in real-world clinical practice. A proactive role of community pharmacists in detecting and resolving these problems could be helpful | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Observational Study | |
650 | 7 | |a Ophthalmic Solutions |2 NLM | |
700 | 1 | |a Delaey, Christophe |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Christiaens, Thierry |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Van Bortel, Luc |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Van Tongelen, Inge |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Remon, Jean-Paul |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Boussery, Koen |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Eye (London, England) |d 1995 |g 34(2020), 8 vom: 05. Aug., Seite 1392-1398 |w (DE-627)NLM012628646 |x 1476-5454 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:34 |g year:2020 |g number:8 |g day:05 |g month:08 |g pages:1392-1398 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41433-019-0665-y |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 34 |j 2020 |e 8 |b 05 |c 08 |h 1392-1398 |