Comparison of Posterior Cruciate-Retaining and High-Flexion Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty Design
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved..
BACKGROUND: High-flexion prostheses have been developed to achieve deep flexion after total knee arthroplasty. The purpose of this study is to compare standard NexGen (CR, cruciate-retaining) and high-flexion NexGen (CR-flex) total knee prostheses in terms of range of motion, clinical and radiologic outcomes, rates of complications, and survivorship in long-term follow-up.
METHODS: From January 2000 to December 2008, 423 consecutive knees underwent total knee arthroplasty using standard CR or CR-flex prostheses. Fifty-three patients were lost to follow-up or declined to participate and 54 died, leaving 290 knees. The minimum duration of follow-up was 8 years (mean 10.1 years). Physical examination and knee scoring of patients were assessed preoperatively, at 6 months and 1 year after surgery, and annually thereafter. Supine anteroposterior and lateral radiographs and standing anteroposterior hip-to-ankle radiographs were obtained preoperatively and at each follow-up.
RESULTS: Mean postoperative range of motions in the standard CR group and the CR-flex group were similar, showing no significant difference between the 2 groups (P = .853). At the time of the final follow-up, mean total Hospital for Special Surgery scores were similar between the 2 groups (P = .118). Mean Knee Society pain (P = .325) and function scores (P = .659) were also comparable between the 2 groups. Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score showed no intergroup difference either (P = .586). The mean hip-knee-ankle angle at the final follow-up was approximately the same (P = .940). Mean coronal angles of femoral and tibial component at final follow-up were also similar (P = .211 and P = .764, respectively). The prevalence of the radiolucent line was 0.6% in the standard CR group and 0.9% in the CR-flex group. Estimated survival rate according to Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was 97.2% in the standard CR group and 95.6% in the CR-flex group at mean follow-up of 10.1 years.
CONCLUSION: This study suggests that excellent clinical and radiographic outcomes could be achieved with both standard and high-flexion CR total knee designs. High-flexion CR prosthesis did not show any advantages over the standard design.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2020 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2020 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:35 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
The Journal of arthroplasty - 35(2020), 3 vom: 18. März, Seite 752-755 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Lee, Won-Gyun [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
Cruciate-retaining |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 07.12.2020 Date Revised 14.12.2020 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1016/j.arth.2019.10.008 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM30280594X |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM30280594X | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231225111511.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231225s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.arth.2019.10.008 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1009.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM30280594X | ||
035 | |a (NLM)31676176 | ||
035 | |a (PII)S0883-5403(19)30942-8 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Lee, Won-Gyun |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Comparison of Posterior Cruciate-Retaining and High-Flexion Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty Design |
264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 07.12.2020 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 14.12.2020 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. | ||
520 | |a BACKGROUND: High-flexion prostheses have been developed to achieve deep flexion after total knee arthroplasty. The purpose of this study is to compare standard NexGen (CR, cruciate-retaining) and high-flexion NexGen (CR-flex) total knee prostheses in terms of range of motion, clinical and radiologic outcomes, rates of complications, and survivorship in long-term follow-up | ||
520 | |a METHODS: From January 2000 to December 2008, 423 consecutive knees underwent total knee arthroplasty using standard CR or CR-flex prostheses. Fifty-three patients were lost to follow-up or declined to participate and 54 died, leaving 290 knees. The minimum duration of follow-up was 8 years (mean 10.1 years). Physical examination and knee scoring of patients were assessed preoperatively, at 6 months and 1 year after surgery, and annually thereafter. Supine anteroposterior and lateral radiographs and standing anteroposterior hip-to-ankle radiographs were obtained preoperatively and at each follow-up | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: Mean postoperative range of motions in the standard CR group and the CR-flex group were similar, showing no significant difference between the 2 groups (P = .853). At the time of the final follow-up, mean total Hospital for Special Surgery scores were similar between the 2 groups (P = .118). Mean Knee Society pain (P = .325) and function scores (P = .659) were also comparable between the 2 groups. Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score showed no intergroup difference either (P = .586). The mean hip-knee-ankle angle at the final follow-up was approximately the same (P = .940). Mean coronal angles of femoral and tibial component at final follow-up were also similar (P = .211 and P = .764, respectively). The prevalence of the radiolucent line was 0.6% in the standard CR group and 0.9% in the CR-flex group. Estimated survival rate according to Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was 97.2% in the standard CR group and 95.6% in the CR-flex group at mean follow-up of 10.1 years | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSION: This study suggests that excellent clinical and radiographic outcomes could be achieved with both standard and high-flexion CR total knee designs. High-flexion CR prosthesis did not show any advantages over the standard design | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a cruciate-retaining | |
650 | 4 | |a high-flexion design | |
650 | 4 | |a knee | |
650 | 4 | |a range of motion | |
650 | 4 | |a total knee arthroplasty | |
700 | 1 | |a Song, Eun-Kyoo |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Choi, Seung-Won |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Jin, Quan He |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Seon, Jong-Keun |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t The Journal of arthroplasty |d 1995 |g 35(2020), 3 vom: 18. März, Seite 752-755 |w (DE-627)NLM012629375 |x 1532-8406 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:35 |g year:2020 |g number:3 |g day:18 |g month:03 |g pages:752-755 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.10.008 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 35 |j 2020 |e 3 |b 18 |c 03 |h 752-755 |