SERIES : eHealth in primary care. Part 2: Exploring the ethical implications of its application in primary care practice
Background: eHealth promises to increase self-management and personalised medicine and improve cost-effectiveness in primary care. Paired with these promises are ethical implications, as eHealth will affect patients' and primary care professionals' (PCPs) experiences, values, norms, and relationships.Objectives: We argue what ethical implications related to the impact of eHealth on four vital aspects of primary care could (and should) be anticipated.Discussion: (1) EHealth influences dealing with predictive and diagnostic uncertainty. Machine-learning based clinical decision support systems offer (seemingly) objective, quantified, and personalised outcomes. However, they also introduce new loci of uncertainty and subjectivity. The decision-making process becomes opaque, and algorithms can be invalid, biased, or even discriminatory. This has implications for professional responsibilities and judgments, justice, autonomy, and trust. (2) EHealth affects the roles and responsibilities of patients because it can stimulate self-management and autonomy. However, autonomy can also be compromised, e.g. in cases of persuasive technologies and eHealth can increase existing health disparities. (3) The delegation of tasks to a network of technologies and stakeholders requires attention for responsibility gaps and new responsibilities. (4) The triangulate relationship: patient-eHealth-PCP requires a reconsideration of the role of human interaction and 'humanness' in primary care as well as of shaping Shared Decision Making.Conclusion: Our analysis is an essential first step towards setting up a dedicated ethics research agenda that should be examined in parallel to the development and implementation of eHealth. The ultimate goal is to inspire the development of practice-specific ethical recommendations.
| Errataetall: |
CommentIn: Scand J Prim Health Care. 2020 Jun;38(2):105-106. - PMID 32484725 |
|---|---|
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2020 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2020 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:26 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
The European journal of general practice - 26(2020), 1 vom: 01. Dez., Seite 26-32 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Boers, Sarah N [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Digital health |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 28.04.2021 Date Revised 28.04.2021 published: Print-Electronic CommentIn: Scand J Prim Health Care. 2020 Jun;38(2):105-106. - PMID 32484725 Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1080/13814788.2019.1678958 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM30268008X |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM30268008X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231225111229.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231225s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/13814788.2019.1678958 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1008.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM30268008X | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)31663394 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Boers, Sarah N |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a SERIES |b eHealth in primary care. Part 2: Exploring the ethical implications of its application in primary care practice |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 28.04.2021 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 28.04.2021 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a CommentIn: Scand J Prim Health Care. 2020 Jun;38(2):105-106. - PMID 32484725 | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a Background: eHealth promises to increase self-management and personalised medicine and improve cost-effectiveness in primary care. Paired with these promises are ethical implications, as eHealth will affect patients' and primary care professionals' (PCPs) experiences, values, norms, and relationships.Objectives: We argue what ethical implications related to the impact of eHealth on four vital aspects of primary care could (and should) be anticipated.Discussion: (1) EHealth influences dealing with predictive and diagnostic uncertainty. Machine-learning based clinical decision support systems offer (seemingly) objective, quantified, and personalised outcomes. However, they also introduce new loci of uncertainty and subjectivity. The decision-making process becomes opaque, and algorithms can be invalid, biased, or even discriminatory. This has implications for professional responsibilities and judgments, justice, autonomy, and trust. (2) EHealth affects the roles and responsibilities of patients because it can stimulate self-management and autonomy. However, autonomy can also be compromised, e.g. in cases of persuasive technologies and eHealth can increase existing health disparities. (3) The delegation of tasks to a network of technologies and stakeholders requires attention for responsibility gaps and new responsibilities. (4) The triangulate relationship: patient-eHealth-PCP requires a reconsideration of the role of human interaction and 'humanness' in primary care as well as of shaping Shared Decision Making.Conclusion: Our analysis is an essential first step towards setting up a dedicated ethics research agenda that should be examined in parallel to the development and implementation of eHealth. The ultimate goal is to inspire the development of practice-specific ethical recommendations | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a digital health | |
| 650 | 4 | |a doctor–patient relationship | |
| 650 | 4 | |a eHealth | |
| 650 | 4 | |a ethics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a primary care | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Jongsma, Karin R |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lucivero, Federica |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Aardoom, Jiska |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Büchner, Frederike L |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a de Vries, Martine |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Honkoop, Persijn |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Houwink, Elisa J F |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kasteleyn, Marise J |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Meijer, Eline |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Pinnock, Hilary |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Teichert, Martina |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a van der Boog, Paul |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a van Luenen, Sanne |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a van der Kleij, Rianne M J J |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Chavannes, Niels H |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t The European journal of general practice |d 1998 |g 26(2020), 1 vom: 01. Dez., Seite 26-32 |w (DE-627)NLM094551847 |x 1751-1402 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:26 |g year:2020 |g number:1 |g day:01 |g month:12 |g pages:26-32 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2019.1678958 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 26 |j 2020 |e 1 |b 01 |c 12 |h 26-32 | ||