Which positive factors give general practitioners job satisfaction and make general practice a rewarding career? A European multicentric qualitative research by the European general practice research network
BACKGROUND: General Practice (GP) seems to be perceived as less attractive throughout Europe. Most of the policies on the subject focused on negative factors. An EGPRN research team from eight participating countries was created in order to clarify the positive factors involved in appeals and retention in GP throughout Europe. The objective was to explore the positive factors supporting the satisfaction of General Practitioners (GPs) in clinical practice throughout Europe.
METHOD: Qualitative study, employing face-to-face interviews and focus groups using a phenomenological approach. The setting was primary care in eight European countries: France, Belgium, Germany, Slovenia, Bulgaria, Finland, Poland and Israel. A thematic qualitative analysis was performed following the process described by Braun and Clarke. Codebooks were generated in each country. After translation and back translation of these codebooks, the team clarified and compared the codes and constructed one international codebook used for further coding.
RESULTS: A purposive sample of 183 GPs, providing primary care to patients in their daily clinical practice, was interviewed across eight countries. The international codebook included 31 interpretative codes and six themes. Five positive themes were common among all the countries involved across Europe: the GP as a person, special skills needed in practice, doctor-patient relationship, freedom in the practice and supportive factors for work-life balance. One theme was not found in Poland or Slovenia: teaching and learning.
CONCLUSION: This study identified positive factors which give GPs job satisfaction in their clinical practice. This description focused on the human needs of a GP. They need to have freedom to choose their working environment and to organize their practice to suit themselves. In addition, they need to have access to professional education so they can develop specific skills for General Practice, and also strengthen doctor-patient relationships. Stakeholders should consider these factors when seeking to increase the GP workforce.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2019 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2019 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:20 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
BMC family practice - 20(2019), 1 vom: 09. Aug., Seite 96 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Le Floch, B [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 06.04.2020 Date Revised 08.04.2020 published: Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1186/s12875-019-0985-9 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM300056664 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM300056664 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231225101707.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231225s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1186/s12875-019-0985-9 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1000.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM300056664 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)31395016 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Le Floch, B |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Which positive factors give general practitioners job satisfaction and make general practice a rewarding career? A European multicentric qualitative research by the European general practice research network |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2019 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 06.04.2020 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 08.04.2020 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a BACKGROUND: General Practice (GP) seems to be perceived as less attractive throughout Europe. Most of the policies on the subject focused on negative factors. An EGPRN research team from eight participating countries was created in order to clarify the positive factors involved in appeals and retention in GP throughout Europe. The objective was to explore the positive factors supporting the satisfaction of General Practitioners (GPs) in clinical practice throughout Europe | ||
| 520 | |a METHOD: Qualitative study, employing face-to-face interviews and focus groups using a phenomenological approach. The setting was primary care in eight European countries: France, Belgium, Germany, Slovenia, Bulgaria, Finland, Poland and Israel. A thematic qualitative analysis was performed following the process described by Braun and Clarke. Codebooks were generated in each country. After translation and back translation of these codebooks, the team clarified and compared the codes and constructed one international codebook used for further coding | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: A purposive sample of 183 GPs, providing primary care to patients in their daily clinical practice, was interviewed across eight countries. The international codebook included 31 interpretative codes and six themes. Five positive themes were common among all the countries involved across Europe: the GP as a person, special skills needed in practice, doctor-patient relationship, freedom in the practice and supportive factors for work-life balance. One theme was not found in Poland or Slovenia: teaching and learning | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSION: This study identified positive factors which give GPs job satisfaction in their clinical practice. This description focused on the human needs of a GP. They need to have freedom to choose their working environment and to organize their practice to suit themselves. In addition, they need to have access to professional education so they can develop specific skills for General Practice, and also strengthen doctor-patient relationships. Stakeholders should consider these factors when seeking to increase the GP workforce | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Multicenter Study | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Adult | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Career choice | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Career mobility | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Family practice | |
| 650 | 4 | |a General practitioners | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Health care system | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Humans | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Job satisfaction | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Physician | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Primary health care | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Bastiaens, H |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Le Reste, J Y |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lingner, H |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Hoffman, R |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Czachowski, S |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Assenova, R |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Koskela, T H |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Klemenc-Ketis, Z |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Nabbe, P |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sowinska, A |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Montier, T |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Peremans, L |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t BMC family practice |d 2000 |g 20(2019), 1 vom: 09. Aug., Seite 96 |w (DE-627)NLM109571606 |x 1471-2296 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:20 |g year:2019 |g number:1 |g day:09 |g month:08 |g pages:96 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-019-0985-9 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 20 |j 2019 |e 1 |b 09 |c 08 |h 96 | ||