Orthotopic neobladder reconstruction for bladder cancer : robotic-assisted versus open-radical cystectomy for perioperative outcomes, functional results and quality of life

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved..

INTRODUCTION: Open radical cystectomy (ORC) is the gold standard technique for carcinologic cystectomies. Robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) was introduced in 2003 and its development is booming.

OBJECTIVE: To compare ORC and RARC with totally intracorporal (IC) orthotopic neobladder (ONB) reconstruction, in terms of perioperative outcomes, morbidity, functional results and quality of life (Qol).

PATIENTS AND METHODS: From February 2010 to February 2017, a French multicentric, prospective study on patients who had a RC and ONB reconstruction for bladder cancer was performed. All patients completed the following questionnaires: the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) generic (QLQ-C30) and the bladder cancer specific instruments (QLQ-BLM30). To assess urinary symptoms, patients also completed the Urinary Symptom Profile questionnaire (USP) and a three-day voiding diary. Patients were divided in two groups: ORC and RARC.

RESULTS: We included 72 patients: 55 in the ORC group (76,4%) and 17 (33,6%) in the RARC group. Operative time was longer in RARC group (median 360 vs 300min; P<0.001) but length of stay was 5 days shorter (median 12 vs 17 days; P<0,05). Patients in RARC group had less blood transfusion (0 vs 23.6%; P<0.05), but a higher rate of uretero-ileal anastomosis stenosis and eventration at long term (respectively 25.5 vs 3.6% et 23 vs 2%; P<0.05). No statistical differences were found concerning quality of life items and functional results between the groups.

CONCLUSION: RARC with totally IC ONB reconstruction lead to less perioperative morbidity with a reduced rate of blood transfusion and a reduced hospital length of stay. At long term, RARC could provide higher rates of uretero-ileal stenosis and eventration. RARC and ORC do not have any differences in terms of functional outcomes and Qol at long term after ONB reconstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Medienart:

E-Artikel

Erscheinungsjahr:

2019

Erschienen:

2019

Enthalten in:

Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:29

Enthalten in:

Progres en urologie : journal de l'Association francaise d'urologie et de la Societe francaise d'urologie - 29(2019), 8-9 vom: 28. Juli, Seite 440-448

Sprache:

Französisch

Weiterer Titel:

Morbidité, résultat fonctionnel, et qualité de vie des néovessies après cystectomie pour cancer : comparaison de la voie ouverte vs robotique

Beteiligte Personen:

Tostivint, V [VerfasserIn]
Roumiguié, M [VerfasserIn]
Cabarrou, B [VerfasserIn]
Verhoest, G [VerfasserIn]
Gas, J [VerfasserIn]
Coloby, P [VerfasserIn]
Soulié, M [VerfasserIn]
Thoulouzan, M [VerfasserIn]
Beauval, J-B [VerfasserIn]

Links:

Volltext

Themen:

Bladder cancer
Cancer de la vessie
Comparative Study
Cystectomie
Cystectomy
Journal Article
Laparoscopie
Laparoscopy
Laparotomie
Multicenter Study
Néovessie orthotopique
Open
Orthotopic neobladder
Qualité de vie
Quality of life
Robot assistance
Robotic

Anmerkungen:

Date Completed 16.01.2020

Date Revised 07.12.2022

published: Print-Electronic

Citation Status MEDLINE

doi:

10.1016/j.purol.2019.05.006

funding:

Förderinstitution / Projekttitel:

PPN (Katalog-ID):

NLM298531836