Retrospective comparative clinical study for silk mat application into extraction socket
BACKGROUND: Silk mats have been approved for clinical trials by the Korean Food and Drug Administration as membranes for guided tissue regeneration (GTR). In this study, silk mat application was compared to high-density polytetrafluoroethylene (dPTFE) membrane application or no membrane group.
METHODS: To compare the silk mat group to the dPTFE group or the no membrane group, a retrospective sample collection was conducted. Bony defects were measured at the time of extraction (T0) and then at 3 months (T1) and 6 months after extraction (T2) on a digital panoramic view. Bone gain (BG) was calculated by subtracting from the bony defect at T0 to the bony defect at each follow-up.
RESULTS: The BG at T2 was 2.44 ± 2.49 mm, 4.18 ± 1.80 mm, and 4.24 ± 2.05 mm in the no membrane group, silk mat group, and dPTFE group, respectively. Both membrane groups had significantly higher BG than BG in the no membrane group at T2 (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Both membrane groups showed higher BG than the no membrane group.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2019 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2019 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:41 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery - 41(2019), 1 vom: 28. Dez., Seite 16 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Kim, Ju-Won [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
Bone gain |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Revised 08.04.2022 published: Electronic-eCollection Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1186/s40902-019-0199-z |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM296776076 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM296776076 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231225090553.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231225s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1186/s40902-019-0199-z |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n0989.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM296776076 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)31058105 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Kim, Ju-Won |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Retrospective comparative clinical study for silk mat application into extraction socket |
264 | 1 | |c 2019 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 08.04.2022 | ||
500 | |a published: Electronic-eCollection | ||
500 | |a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a BACKGROUND: Silk mats have been approved for clinical trials by the Korean Food and Drug Administration as membranes for guided tissue regeneration (GTR). In this study, silk mat application was compared to high-density polytetrafluoroethylene (dPTFE) membrane application or no membrane group | ||
520 | |a METHODS: To compare the silk mat group to the dPTFE group or the no membrane group, a retrospective sample collection was conducted. Bony defects were measured at the time of extraction (T0) and then at 3 months (T1) and 6 months after extraction (T2) on a digital panoramic view. Bone gain (BG) was calculated by subtracting from the bony defect at T0 to the bony defect at each follow-up | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: The BG at T2 was 2.44 ± 2.49 mm, 4.18 ± 1.80 mm, and 4.24 ± 2.05 mm in the no membrane group, silk mat group, and dPTFE group, respectively. Both membrane groups had significantly higher BG than BG in the no membrane group at T2 (P < 0.05) | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: Both membrane groups showed higher BG than the no membrane group | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Bone gain | |
650 | 4 | |a Guided tissue regeneration | |
650 | 4 | |a Polytetrafluoroethylene | |
650 | 4 | |a Probing depth | |
650 | 4 | |a Silk mat | |
700 | 1 | |a Jo, You-Young |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Kim, Jwa-Young |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Oh, Ji-Hyeon |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Yang, Byoung-Eun |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Kim, Seong-Gon |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery |d 2014 |g 41(2019), 1 vom: 28. Dez., Seite 16 |w (DE-627)NLM245971963 |x 2288-8586 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:41 |g year:2019 |g number:1 |g day:28 |g month:12 |g pages:16 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40902-019-0199-z |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 41 |j 2019 |e 1 |b 28 |c 12 |h 16 |