Retrospective comparative clinical study for silk mat application into extraction socket

BACKGROUND: Silk mats have been approved for clinical trials by the Korean Food and Drug Administration as membranes for guided tissue regeneration (GTR). In this study, silk mat application was compared to high-density polytetrafluoroethylene (dPTFE) membrane application or no membrane group.

METHODS: To compare the silk mat group to the dPTFE group or the no membrane group, a retrospective sample collection was conducted. Bony defects were measured at the time of extraction (T0) and then at 3 months (T1) and 6 months after extraction (T2) on a digital panoramic view. Bone gain (BG) was calculated by subtracting from the bony defect at T0 to the bony defect at each follow-up.

RESULTS: The BG at T2 was 2.44 ± 2.49 mm, 4.18 ± 1.80 mm, and 4.24 ± 2.05 mm in the no membrane group, silk mat group, and dPTFE group, respectively. Both membrane groups had significantly higher BG than BG in the no membrane group at T2 (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS: Both membrane groups showed higher BG than the no membrane group.

Medienart:

E-Artikel

Erscheinungsjahr:

2019

Erschienen:

2019

Enthalten in:

Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:41

Enthalten in:

Maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery - 41(2019), 1 vom: 28. Dez., Seite 16

Sprache:

Englisch

Beteiligte Personen:

Kim, Ju-Won [VerfasserIn]
Jo, You-Young [VerfasserIn]
Kim, Jwa-Young [VerfasserIn]
Oh, Ji-Hyeon [VerfasserIn]
Yang, Byoung-Eun [VerfasserIn]
Kim, Seong-Gon [VerfasserIn]

Links:

Volltext

Themen:

Bone gain
Guided tissue regeneration
Journal Article
Polytetrafluoroethylene
Probing depth
Silk mat

Anmerkungen:

Date Revised 08.04.2022

published: Electronic-eCollection

Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE

doi:

10.1186/s40902-019-0199-z

funding:

Förderinstitution / Projekttitel:

PPN (Katalog-ID):

NLM296776076