Physiochemical and functional properties of gelatin obtained from tuna, frog and chicken skins
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved..
Growing demand for gelatin has increased interest in using alternative raw materials. In this study, different animal skins; namely frog, tuna and chicken skins; were utilized in gelatin extraction by previously optimized extraction procedures. Quality characteristics and functional properties of the resultant gelatins were comparatively investigated. Frog skin gelatin had the highest protein content with 77.8% while the highest hydroxyproline content was found in chicken skin gelatin with 6.4%. Frog skin gelatin showed a significantly higher melting point (42.7 °C) compared to tuna and chicken gelatins. Bloom value was also significantly higher in frog skin gelatin compared to that of chicken and tuna skin gelatins. Results showed that processing waste like skins of different animals may present opportunities in gelatin production as high quality alternatives. This study may help the industry by providing one hand comparable data over potentially significant sources.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2019 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2019 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:287 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Food chemistry - 287(2019) vom: 30. Juli, Seite 273-279 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Aksun Tümerkan, Elif Tuğce [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
9000-70-8 |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 29.05.2019 Date Revised 29.05.2019 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.02.088 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM294812253 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM294812253 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231225082309.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231225s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.02.088 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n0982.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM294812253 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)30857699 | ||
| 035 | |a (PII)S0308-8146(19)30411-X | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Aksun Tümerkan, Elif Tuğce |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Physiochemical and functional properties of gelatin obtained from tuna, frog and chicken skins |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2019 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 29.05.2019 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 29.05.2019 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. | ||
| 520 | |a Growing demand for gelatin has increased interest in using alternative raw materials. In this study, different animal skins; namely frog, tuna and chicken skins; were utilized in gelatin extraction by previously optimized extraction procedures. Quality characteristics and functional properties of the resultant gelatins were comparatively investigated. Frog skin gelatin had the highest protein content with 77.8% while the highest hydroxyproline content was found in chicken skin gelatin with 6.4%. Frog skin gelatin showed a significantly higher melting point (42.7 °C) compared to tuna and chicken gelatins. Bloom value was also significantly higher in frog skin gelatin compared to that of chicken and tuna skin gelatins. Results showed that processing waste like skins of different animals may present opportunities in gelatin production as high quality alternatives. This study may help the industry by providing one hand comparable data over potentially significant sources | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Bloom | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Chicken skin | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Frog skin | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Gelatin | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Quality | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Tuna skin | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Gelatin |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a 9000-70-8 |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Hydroxyproline |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a RMB44WO89X |2 NLM | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Cansu, Ümran |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Boran, Gökhan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Regenstein, Joe Mac |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Özoğul, Fatih |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Food chemistry |d 1995 |g 287(2019) vom: 30. Juli, Seite 273-279 |w (DE-627)NLM076785823 |x 1873-7072 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:287 |g year:2019 |g day:30 |g month:07 |g pages:273-279 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.02.088 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 287 |j 2019 |b 30 |c 07 |h 273-279 | ||