Acute Respiratory Failure Survivors' Physical, Cognitive, and Mental Health Outcomes : Quantitative Measures versus Semistructured Interviews
Rationale: Increasingly, patients are surviving acute respiratory failure (ARF), prompting the need to better understand standardized outcome measures commonly used during ARF follow-up studies. Objectives: Investigate standardized outcome measures (patient-reported physical and mental health measures, and cognitive testing) compared with findings from semistructured, qualitative interviews. Methods: As part of two ARF multicenter follow-up studies, standardized outcome measures were obtained, followed by qualitative evaluation via an in-depth, semistructured interview conducted and coded by two independent researchers. Qualitative interviews revealed the following post-ARF survivorship themes: physical impairment; anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms; and cognitive impairment. Scores from standardized measures related to these themes were compared for ARF survivors reporting versus not reporting these themes in their qualitative interviews. Results: Of 59 invited ARF survivors, 48 (81%) completed both standardized outcome measures and qualitative interviews. Participants' median (interquartile range) age was 53 (43-64) years; 54% were female, and 88% were living independently before hospitalization. The two independent reviewers classifying the presence or absence of themes from the qualitative interviews had excellent agreement (κ = 0.80). There were significantly worse scores on standardized outcome measures for survivors reporting (vs. not reporting) physical and mental health impairments in their qualitative interviews. However, standardized cognitive test scores did not differ between patients reporting versus not reporting cognitive impairments in their qualitative interviews. Conclusions: These findings support the use of recommended, commonly used standardized outcome measures for physical and mental health impairments in ARF survivorship research. However, caution is needed in interpreting self-reported cognitive function compared with standardized cognitive testing.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2019 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2019 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:16 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Annals of the American Thoracic Society - 16(2019), 6 vom: 15. Juni, Seite 731-737 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Nelliot, Archana [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Critical illness |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 23.07.2020 Date Revised 09.12.2020 published: Print Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1513/AnnalsATS.201812-851OC |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM294681663 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM294681663 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231225082020.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231225s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201812-851OC |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n0982.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM294681663 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)30844293 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Nelliot, Archana |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Acute Respiratory Failure Survivors' Physical, Cognitive, and Mental Health Outcomes |b Quantitative Measures versus Semistructured Interviews |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2019 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 23.07.2020 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 09.12.2020 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a Rationale: Increasingly, patients are surviving acute respiratory failure (ARF), prompting the need to better understand standardized outcome measures commonly used during ARF follow-up studies. Objectives: Investigate standardized outcome measures (patient-reported physical and mental health measures, and cognitive testing) compared with findings from semistructured, qualitative interviews. Methods: As part of two ARF multicenter follow-up studies, standardized outcome measures were obtained, followed by qualitative evaluation via an in-depth, semistructured interview conducted and coded by two independent researchers. Qualitative interviews revealed the following post-ARF survivorship themes: physical impairment; anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms; and cognitive impairment. Scores from standardized measures related to these themes were compared for ARF survivors reporting versus not reporting these themes in their qualitative interviews. Results: Of 59 invited ARF survivors, 48 (81%) completed both standardized outcome measures and qualitative interviews. Participants' median (interquartile range) age was 53 (43-64) years; 54% were female, and 88% were living independently before hospitalization. The two independent reviewers classifying the presence or absence of themes from the qualitative interviews had excellent agreement (κ = 0.80). There were significantly worse scores on standardized outcome measures for survivors reporting (vs. not reporting) physical and mental health impairments in their qualitative interviews. However, standardized cognitive test scores did not differ between patients reporting versus not reporting cognitive impairments in their qualitative interviews. Conclusions: These findings support the use of recommended, commonly used standardized outcome measures for physical and mental health impairments in ARF survivorship research. However, caution is needed in interpreting self-reported cognitive function compared with standardized cognitive testing | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't | |
| 650 | 4 | |a critical illness | |
| 650 | 4 | |a follow-up studies | |
| 650 | 4 | |a patient outcomes | |
| 650 | 4 | |a qualitative research | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Dinglas, Victor D |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a O'Toole, Jacqueline |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Patel, Yashika |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Mendez-Tellez, Pedro A |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Nabeel, Mohammed |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Friedman, Lisa Aronson |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Hough, Catherine L |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Hopkins, Ramona O |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Eakin, Michelle N |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Needham, Dale M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Annals of the American Thoracic Society |d 2013 |g 16(2019), 6 vom: 15. Juni, Seite 731-737 |w (DE-627)NLM225943336 |x 2325-6621 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:16 |g year:2019 |g number:6 |g day:15 |g month:06 |g pages:731-737 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.201812-851OC |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 16 |j 2019 |e 6 |b 15 |c 06 |h 731-737 | ||