Comparison of Modified Transtibial and Anteromedial Portal Techniques in Anatomic Single-Bundle ACL Reconstruction
Copyright 2019, SLACK Incorporated..
The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical, 3-dimensional computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and second-look arthroscopic findings of the modified transtibial technique with those of the anteromedial portal technique in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (SB-ACLR). Among patients who underwent SB-ACLR from February 2012 to May 2014, 95 patients with a minimum of 36 months of follow-up were included in this retrospective study. Forty-five patients underwent a reconstruction using the modified transtibial technique. Fifty patients underwent a reconstruction using the anteromedial portal technique. Clinical scores and stabilities were recorded preoperatively and at final follow-up. All patients had postoperative computed tomography and the computed tomography parameters, including tunnel position and graft obliquity, evaluated. Additionally, postoperative magnetic resonance imaging and second-look arthroscopy were performed. On the basis of the functional and stability outcomes, all of the patients showed significant improvement after SB-ACLR, with no significant differences existing between the 2 groups (P>.05). Tunnel position and obliquity were not significantly different between the 2 groups (P>.05). There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups regarding the magnetic resonance imaging and second-look arthroscopy findings (P>.05). The tunnel characteristics and clinical results of the 2 techniques were comparable. Given the several advantages of the modified transtibial technique, including its simplicity and patients' greater activity level, it is suitable for anatomic SB-ACLR. [Orthopedics. 2019; 42(2):83-89.].
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2019 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2019 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:42 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Orthopedics - 42(2019), 2 vom: 01. März, Seite 83-89 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Han, Joung Kyue [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 16.05.2019 Date Revised 16.05.2019 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.3928/01477447-20190211-04 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM293890013 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM293890013 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231225080309.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231225s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.3928/01477447-20190211-04 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n0979.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM293890013 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)30763445 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Han, Joung Kyue |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Comparison of Modified Transtibial and Anteromedial Portal Techniques in Anatomic Single-Bundle ACL Reconstruction |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2019 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 16.05.2019 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 16.05.2019 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a Copyright 2019, SLACK Incorporated. | ||
| 520 | |a The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical, 3-dimensional computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and second-look arthroscopic findings of the modified transtibial technique with those of the anteromedial portal technique in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (SB-ACLR). Among patients who underwent SB-ACLR from February 2012 to May 2014, 95 patients with a minimum of 36 months of follow-up were included in this retrospective study. Forty-five patients underwent a reconstruction using the modified transtibial technique. Fifty patients underwent a reconstruction using the anteromedial portal technique. Clinical scores and stabilities were recorded preoperatively and at final follow-up. All patients had postoperative computed tomography and the computed tomography parameters, including tunnel position and graft obliquity, evaluated. Additionally, postoperative magnetic resonance imaging and second-look arthroscopy were performed. On the basis of the functional and stability outcomes, all of the patients showed significant improvement after SB-ACLR, with no significant differences existing between the 2 groups (P>.05). Tunnel position and obliquity were not significantly different between the 2 groups (P>.05). There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups regarding the magnetic resonance imaging and second-look arthroscopy findings (P>.05). The tunnel characteristics and clinical results of the 2 techniques were comparable. Given the several advantages of the modified transtibial technique, including its simplicity and patients' greater activity level, it is suitable for anatomic SB-ACLR. [Orthopedics. 2019; 42(2):83-89.] | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Comparative Study | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Chun, Keun Churl |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lee, Seong In |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kim, Saintpee |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Chun, Churl Hong |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Orthopedics |d 1978 |g 42(2019), 2 vom: 01. März, Seite 83-89 |w (DE-627)NLM000843628 |x 0147-7447 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:42 |g year:2019 |g number:2 |g day:01 |g month:03 |g pages:83-89 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20190211-04 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 42 |j 2019 |e 2 |b 01 |c 03 |h 83-89 | ||