Effect of using cardiovascular risk scoring in routine risk assessment in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease : an overview of systematic reviews
BACKGROUND: Our objectives were to critically appraise and summarise the current evidence for the effectiveness of using cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk scoring (total risk assessment - TRA) in routine risk assessment in primary prevention of CVD compared with standard care with regards to patients outcomes, clinical risk factor levels, medication prescribing, and adverse effects.
METHODS: We carried out an overview of existing systematic reviews (SRs). Presentation of the results aligned guidelines from the PRISMA statement. The data is presented as a narrative synthesis. We searched MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE, CENTRAL and SCOPUS databases from January 1990 to March 2017, reviewed the reference lists of all included SRs and searched for ongoing SRs in PROSPERO database. We encompassed SRs and meta-analyses which took into account RCTs, quasi-RCTs, and observational studies investigating the effect of using CVD risk scoring. Only studies performed in a primary care setting, with adult participants free of clinical CVD were eligible. Intervention was CVD risk assessment with use of the total CVD risk scoring compared with standard care with no use of TRA.
RESULTS: We identified 2157 records, we then recognised and analysed 10 relevant SRs. One SR reported statistically insignificant reduction of CVD death, when using TRA, the second SR presented meta-analysis which reported no effect on fatal and non-fatal CV events compared with conventional care (5.4% vs 5.3%; RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.08; I2 = 25%). Three SRs have shown that using TRA causes no adverse events. The impact of TRA on global CVD risk as well as individual risk factors is ambiguous, but a tendency towards slight reduction of blood pressure, total cholesterol and smoking levels, especially in high risk patient groups was observed. TRA had no influence on lifestyle behaviour.
CONCLUSIONS: There is limited evidence, of low overall quality, suggesting a possible lack of effectiveness of TRA in reducing CVD events and mortality, as well as a clinically insignificant influence on individual risk factor levels. Using TRA does not cause harm to patients.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: Systematic review protocol was registered with the International PROSPERO database - registration number CRD42016046898.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2019 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2019 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:19 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
BMC cardiovascular disorders - 19(2019), 1 vom: 09. Jan., Seite 11 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Studziński, Krzysztof [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Cardiovascular diseases |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 12.12.2019 Date Revised 09.03.2020 published: Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1186/s12872-018-0990-2 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM292547218 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM292547218 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231225073342.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231225s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1186/s12872-018-0990-2 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n0975.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM292547218 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)30626326 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Studziński, Krzysztof |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Effect of using cardiovascular risk scoring in routine risk assessment in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease |b an overview of systematic reviews |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2019 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 12.12.2019 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 09.03.2020 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a BACKGROUND: Our objectives were to critically appraise and summarise the current evidence for the effectiveness of using cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk scoring (total risk assessment - TRA) in routine risk assessment in primary prevention of CVD compared with standard care with regards to patients outcomes, clinical risk factor levels, medication prescribing, and adverse effects | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: We carried out an overview of existing systematic reviews (SRs). Presentation of the results aligned guidelines from the PRISMA statement. The data is presented as a narrative synthesis. We searched MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE, CENTRAL and SCOPUS databases from January 1990 to March 2017, reviewed the reference lists of all included SRs and searched for ongoing SRs in PROSPERO database. We encompassed SRs and meta-analyses which took into account RCTs, quasi-RCTs, and observational studies investigating the effect of using CVD risk scoring. Only studies performed in a primary care setting, with adult participants free of clinical CVD were eligible. Intervention was CVD risk assessment with use of the total CVD risk scoring compared with standard care with no use of TRA | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: We identified 2157 records, we then recognised and analysed 10 relevant SRs. One SR reported statistically insignificant reduction of CVD death, when using TRA, the second SR presented meta-analysis which reported no effect on fatal and non-fatal CV events compared with conventional care (5.4% vs 5.3%; RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.08; I2 = 25%). Three SRs have shown that using TRA causes no adverse events. The impact of TRA on global CVD risk as well as individual risk factors is ambiguous, but a tendency towards slight reduction of blood pressure, total cholesterol and smoking levels, especially in high risk patient groups was observed. TRA had no influence on lifestyle behaviour | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: There is limited evidence, of low overall quality, suggesting a possible lack of effectiveness of TRA in reducing CVD events and mortality, as well as a clinically insignificant influence on individual risk factor levels. Using TRA does not cause harm to patients | ||
| 520 | |a TRIAL REGISTRATION: Systematic review protocol was registered with the International PROSPERO database - registration number CRD42016046898 | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Review | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Cardiovascular diseases | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Cardiovascular system | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Primary prevention | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Risk assessment | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Risk factors | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Tomasik, Tomasz |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Krzysztoń, Janusz |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Jóźwiak, Jacek |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Windak, Adam |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t BMC cardiovascular disorders |d 2001 |g 19(2019), 1 vom: 09. Jan., Seite 11 |w (DE-627)NLM11347802X |x 1471-2261 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:19 |g year:2019 |g number:1 |g day:09 |g month:01 |g pages:11 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-018-0990-2 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 19 |j 2019 |e 1 |b 09 |c 01 |h 11 | ||