Should we screen for frailty in primary care settings? A fresh perspective on the frailty evidence base : A narrative review
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved..
With older adults living longer, health service providers have increasingly turned their attention towards frailty and its significant consequences for health and well-being. Consequently, frailty screening has gained momentum as a possible health policy answer to the question of what can be done to prevent frailty's onset and progression. However, who should be screened for frailty, where and when remains a subject of extensive debate. The purpose of this narrative review is to explore the dimensions of this question with reference to Wilson and Jungner's time-tested and widely accepted principles for acceptable screening within community settings. Although the balance of the emerging evidence to support frailty screening is promising, significant gaps in the evidence base remain. Consequently, when assessed against Wilson and Jungner's principles, extensive population screening does not appear to be supported by the evidence. However, screening for the purpose of case-finding may prove useful among older adults.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2019 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2019 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:119 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Preventive medicine - 119(2019) vom: 28. Feb., Seite 63-69 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Ambagtsheer, Rachel C [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Aged |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 18.03.2020 Date Revised 18.03.2020 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.12.020 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM292236263 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM292236263 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231225072640.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231225s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.12.020 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n0974.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM292236263 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)30594533 | ||
| 035 | |a (PII)S0091-7435(18)30399-2 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Ambagtsheer, Rachel C |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Should we screen for frailty in primary care settings? A fresh perspective on the frailty evidence base |b A narrative review |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2019 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 18.03.2020 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 18.03.2020 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. | ||
| 520 | |a With older adults living longer, health service providers have increasingly turned their attention towards frailty and its significant consequences for health and well-being. Consequently, frailty screening has gained momentum as a possible health policy answer to the question of what can be done to prevent frailty's onset and progression. However, who should be screened for frailty, where and when remains a subject of extensive debate. The purpose of this narrative review is to explore the dimensions of this question with reference to Wilson and Jungner's time-tested and widely accepted principles for acceptable screening within community settings. Although the balance of the emerging evidence to support frailty screening is promising, significant gaps in the evidence base remain. Consequently, when assessed against Wilson and Jungner's principles, extensive population screening does not appear to be supported by the evidence. However, screening for the purpose of case-finding may prove useful among older adults | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Review | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Aged | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Aged, 80 and over | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Family practice | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Frailty | |
| 650 | 4 | |a General practice | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Geriatric assessment | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Mass screening | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Primary health care | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Beilby, Justin J |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Visvanathan, Renuka |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Dent, Elsa |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Yu, Solomon |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Braunack-Mayer, Annette J |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Preventive medicine |d 1972 |g 119(2019) vom: 28. Feb., Seite 63-69 |w (DE-627)NLM000160423 |x 1096-0260 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:119 |g year:2019 |g day:28 |g month:02 |g pages:63-69 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.12.020 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 119 |j 2019 |b 28 |c 02 |h 63-69 | ||