Comparison of the effects of different positive end-expiratory pressure levels on respiratory mechanics and oxygenation in laparoscopic surgery : A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analyses
BACKGROUND: Several studies have observed the good effects of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) application in laparoscopic surgeries, such as counteracted intraoperative atelectasis, improved respiratory mechanics, and gas exchange. However, evidence of systematic comparisons of different PEEP levels is short, and the optimal level of PEEP during laparoscopy remains unknown and controversial. The study aims to compare the effects of different PEEP levels on respiratory mechanics and oxygenation in laparoscopic surgery using network meta-analyses.
METHODS: To identify relevant studies, a systematic search will be conducted among electronic databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Web of Science. We will include randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The risk of bias in the included RCTs will be assessed using the Cochrane bias risk tool. Network meta-analysis will be performed using STATA 15.0, and R 3.4.1 software.
RESULTS: This study is ongoing and the results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.
CONCLUSION: The results of this study will be sent to clinicians and healthcare providers in the National Health Service, which is expected to help clinicians make more informed treatment decisions and facilitate further research on the use of PEEP during surgery.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018093537.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2018 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2018 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:97 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Medicine - 97(2018), 48 vom: 03. Nov., Seite e13396 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Wang, Min [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 04.01.2019 Date Revised 05.10.2022 published: Print Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1097/MD.0000000000013396 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM291397107 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM291397107 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231225070804.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231225s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1097/MD.0000000000013396 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n0971.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM291397107 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)30508938 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Wang, Min |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Comparison of the effects of different positive end-expiratory pressure levels on respiratory mechanics and oxygenation in laparoscopic surgery |b A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analyses |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2018 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 04.01.2019 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 05.10.2022 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a BACKGROUND: Several studies have observed the good effects of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) application in laparoscopic surgeries, such as counteracted intraoperative atelectasis, improved respiratory mechanics, and gas exchange. However, evidence of systematic comparisons of different PEEP levels is short, and the optimal level of PEEP during laparoscopy remains unknown and controversial. The study aims to compare the effects of different PEEP levels on respiratory mechanics and oxygenation in laparoscopic surgery using network meta-analyses | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: To identify relevant studies, a systematic search will be conducted among electronic databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Web of Science. We will include randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The risk of bias in the included RCTs will be assessed using the Cochrane bias risk tool. Network meta-analysis will be performed using STATA 15.0, and R 3.4.1 software | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: This study is ongoing and the results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSION: The results of this study will be sent to clinicians and healthcare providers in the National Health Service, which is expected to help clinicians make more informed treatment decisions and facilitate further research on the use of PEEP during surgery | ||
| 520 | |a PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018093537 | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Geng, Nan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Gao, Ya |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Zhang, Yan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wang, Yingbin |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Shen, Xiping |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Tian, Jinhui |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wang, Bo |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Medicine |d 1945 |g 97(2018), 48 vom: 03. Nov., Seite e13396 |w (DE-627)NLM000020737 |x 1536-5964 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:97 |g year:2018 |g number:48 |g day:03 |g month:11 |g pages:e13396 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000013396 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 97 |j 2018 |e 48 |b 03 |c 11 |h e13396 | ||