Prediction models for the incidence and progression of periodontitis : A systematic review
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd..
AIMS: To comprehensively review, identify and critically assess the performance of models predicting the incidence and progression of periodontitis.
METHODS: Electronic searches of the MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASE, DOSS, Web of Science, Scopus and ProQuest databases, and hand searching of reference lists and citations were conducted. No date or language restrictions were used. The Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies checklist was followed when extracting data and appraising the selected studies.
RESULTS: Of the 2,560 records, five studies with 12 prediction models and three risk assessment studies were included. The prediction models showed great heterogeneity precluding meta-analysis. Eight criteria were identified for periodontitis incidence and progression. Four models from one study examined the incidence, while others assessed progression. Age, smoking and diabetes status were common predictors used in modelling. Only two studies reported external validation. Predictive performance of the models (discrimination and calibration) was unable to be fully assessed or compared quantitatively. Nevertheless, most models had "good" ability to discriminate between people at risk for periodontitis.
CONCLUSIONS: Existing predictive modelling approaches were identified. However, no studies followed the recommended methodology, and almost all models were characterized by a generally poor level of reporting.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2018 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2018 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:45 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Journal of clinical periodontology - 45(2018), 12 vom: 05. Dez., Seite 1408-1420 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Du, Mi [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Journal Article |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 29.10.2019 Date Revised 31.05.2022 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1111/jcpe.13037 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM290278627 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM290278627 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231225064402.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231225s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/jcpe.13037 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n0967.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM290278627 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)30394558 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Du, Mi |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Prediction models for the incidence and progression of periodontitis |b A systematic review |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2018 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 29.10.2019 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 31.05.2022 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a © 2018 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. | ||
| 520 | |a AIMS: To comprehensively review, identify and critically assess the performance of models predicting the incidence and progression of periodontitis | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: Electronic searches of the MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASE, DOSS, Web of Science, Scopus and ProQuest databases, and hand searching of reference lists and citations were conducted. No date or language restrictions were used. The Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies checklist was followed when extracting data and appraising the selected studies | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: Of the 2,560 records, five studies with 12 prediction models and three risk assessment studies were included. The prediction models showed great heterogeneity precluding meta-analysis. Eight criteria were identified for periodontitis incidence and progression. Four models from one study examined the incidence, while others assessed progression. Age, smoking and diabetes status were common predictors used in modelling. Only two studies reported external validation. Predictive performance of the models (discrimination and calibration) was unable to be fully assessed or compared quantitatively. Nevertheless, most models had "good" ability to discriminate between people at risk for periodontitis | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: Existing predictive modelling approaches were identified. However, no studies followed the recommended methodology, and almost all models were characterized by a generally poor level of reporting | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Meta-Analysis | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Systematic Review | |
| 650 | 4 | |a periodontitis | |
| 650 | 4 | |a prediction | |
| 650 | 4 | |a risk factors | |
| 650 | 4 | |a systematic review | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Bo, Tao |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kapellas, Kostas |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Peres, Marco A |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of clinical periodontology |d 1974 |g 45(2018), 12 vom: 05. Dez., Seite 1408-1420 |w (DE-627)NLM000276847 |x 1600-051X |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:45 |g year:2018 |g number:12 |g day:05 |g month:12 |g pages:1408-1420 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13037 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 45 |j 2018 |e 12 |b 05 |c 12 |h 1408-1420 | ||