Highly visible sepsis publications from 2012 to 2017 : Analysis and comparison of altmetrics and bibliometrics
Published by Elsevier Inc..
PURPOSE: We sought to delineate highly visible publications related to sepsis. Within these subsets, elements of altmetrics performance, including mentions on Twitter, and the correlation between altmetrics and conventional citation counts were ascertained.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three subsets of sepsis publications from 2012 to 2017 were synthesized by the overall Altmetric.com attention score, number of mentions by unique Twitter users, and conventional citation counts. For these subsets, geolocated Twitter activity was plotted on a choropleth, the lag between publication date and altmetrics mentions was characterized, and correlations were examined between altmetrics performance and normalized conventional citation counts.
RESULTS: Of 57,152 PubMed query results, Altmetric.com data was available for 28,344 (49.6%). The top 50 publications by Altmetric.com attention score and Twitter attention represented a mix of original research and other types of work, garnering attention from Twitter users in 143 countries that was highly contemporaneous with publication. Altmetrics performance and conventional citation counts were poorly correlated.
CONCLUSIONS: While unreliable to gauge impact or future citation potential, altmetrics may be valuable for parties who wish to detect and drive public awareness of research findings and may enable researchers to dynamically explore the reach of their work in novel dimensions.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2018 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2018 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:48 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Journal of critical care - 48(2018) vom: 15. Dez., Seite 357-371 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Jabaley, Craig S [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Bibliometrics |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 15.10.2019 Date Revised 15.10.2019 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.09.033 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM289320631 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM289320631 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231225062308.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231225s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.09.033 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n0964.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM289320631 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)30296750 | ||
| 035 | |a (PII)S0883-9441(18)30883-9 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Jabaley, Craig S |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Highly visible sepsis publications from 2012 to 2017 |b Analysis and comparison of altmetrics and bibliometrics |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2018 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 15.10.2019 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 15.10.2019 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a Published by Elsevier Inc. | ||
| 520 | |a PURPOSE: We sought to delineate highly visible publications related to sepsis. Within these subsets, elements of altmetrics performance, including mentions on Twitter, and the correlation between altmetrics and conventional citation counts were ascertained | ||
| 520 | |a MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three subsets of sepsis publications from 2012 to 2017 were synthesized by the overall Altmetric.com attention score, number of mentions by unique Twitter users, and conventional citation counts. For these subsets, geolocated Twitter activity was plotted on a choropleth, the lag between publication date and altmetrics mentions was characterized, and correlations were examined between altmetrics performance and normalized conventional citation counts | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: Of 57,152 PubMed query results, Altmetric.com data was available for 28,344 (49.6%). The top 50 publications by Altmetric.com attention score and Twitter attention represented a mix of original research and other types of work, garnering attention from Twitter users in 143 countries that was highly contemporaneous with publication. Altmetrics performance and conventional citation counts were poorly correlated | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: While unreliable to gauge impact or future citation potential, altmetrics may be valuable for parties who wish to detect and drive public awareness of research findings and may enable researchers to dynamically explore the reach of their work in novel dimensions | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Comparative Study | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Bibliometrics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Critical care | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Information dissemination | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Information science | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Scholarly communication | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Sepsis | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Groff, Robert F |c 4th |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Stentz, Michael J |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Moll, Vanessa |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lynde, Grant C |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Blum, James M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a O'Reilly-Shah, Vikas N |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of critical care |d 1987 |g 48(2018) vom: 15. Dez., Seite 357-371 |w (DE-627)NLM074731068 |x 1557-8615 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:48 |g year:2018 |g day:15 |g month:12 |g pages:357-371 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.09.033 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 48 |j 2018 |b 15 |c 12 |h 357-371 | ||