Is palliative care cost-effective in low-income and middle-income countries? A mixed-methods systematic review
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ..
INTRODUCTION: Of the 40 million people globally in need of palliative care (PC), just 14% receive it, predominantly in high-income countries. Within fragile health systems that lack PC, incurable illness is often marked by pain and suffering, as well as burdensome costs. In high-income settings, PC decreases healthcare utilisation, thus enhancing value. Similar cost-effectiveness models are lacking in low-income and middle-income countries and with them, the impetus and funding to expand PC delivery.
METHODS: We conducted a systematic search of seven databases to gather evidence of the cost-effectiveness of PC in low-income and middle-income countries. We extracted and synthesised palliative outcomes and economic data from original research studies occurring in low-income and middle-income countries. This review adheres to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and includes a quality appraisal.
RESULTS: Our search identified 10 eligible papers that included palliative and economic outcomes in low-income and middle-income countries. Four provided true cost-effectiveness analyses in comparing the costs of PC versus alternative care, with PC offering cost savings, favourable palliative outcomes and positive patient-reported and family-reported outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the small number of included studies, wide variety of study types and lack of high-quality studies, several patterns emerged: (1) low-cost PC delivery in low-income and middle-income countries is possible, (2) patient-reported outcomes are favourable and (3) PC is less costly than the alternative. This review highlights the extraordinary need for robust cost-effectiveness analysis of PC in low-income and middle-income countries in order to develop health economic models for the delivery of PC, direct resource allocation and guide healthcare policy for PC delivery in low-income and middle-income countries.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2019 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2019 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:9 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
BMJ supportive & palliative care - 9(2019), 2 vom: 25. Juni, Seite 120-129 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Reid, Eleanor Anderson [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
Cost-effectiveness |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 29.07.2019 Date Revised 29.07.2019 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1136/bmjspcare-2018-001499 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM289106338 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM289106338 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231225061825.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231225s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1136/bmjspcare-2018-001499 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n0963.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM289106338 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)30274970 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Reid, Eleanor Anderson |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Is palliative care cost-effective in low-income and middle-income countries? A mixed-methods systematic review |
264 | 1 | |c 2019 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 29.07.2019 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 29.07.2019 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. | ||
520 | |a INTRODUCTION: Of the 40 million people globally in need of palliative care (PC), just 14% receive it, predominantly in high-income countries. Within fragile health systems that lack PC, incurable illness is often marked by pain and suffering, as well as burdensome costs. In high-income settings, PC decreases healthcare utilisation, thus enhancing value. Similar cost-effectiveness models are lacking in low-income and middle-income countries and with them, the impetus and funding to expand PC delivery | ||
520 | |a METHODS: We conducted a systematic search of seven databases to gather evidence of the cost-effectiveness of PC in low-income and middle-income countries. We extracted and synthesised palliative outcomes and economic data from original research studies occurring in low-income and middle-income countries. This review adheres to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and includes a quality appraisal | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: Our search identified 10 eligible papers that included palliative and economic outcomes in low-income and middle-income countries. Four provided true cost-effectiveness analyses in comparing the costs of PC versus alternative care, with PC offering cost savings, favourable palliative outcomes and positive patient-reported and family-reported outcomes | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: Despite the small number of included studies, wide variety of study types and lack of high-quality studies, several patterns emerged: (1) low-cost PC delivery in low-income and middle-income countries is possible, (2) patient-reported outcomes are favourable and (3) PC is less costly than the alternative. This review highlights the extraordinary need for robust cost-effectiveness analysis of PC in low-income and middle-income countries in order to develop health economic models for the delivery of PC, direct resource allocation and guide healthcare policy for PC delivery in low-income and middle-income countries | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Systematic Review | |
650 | 4 | |a cost-effectiveness | |
650 | 4 | |a costs | |
650 | 4 | |a low and middle-income countries | |
650 | 4 | |a palliative care | |
700 | 1 | |a Kovalerchik, Olga |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Jubanyik, Karen |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Brown, Stuart |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Hersey, Denise |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Grant, Liz |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t BMJ supportive & palliative care |d 2011 |g 9(2019), 2 vom: 25. Juni, Seite 120-129 |w (DE-627)NLM226675734 |x 2045-4368 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:9 |g year:2019 |g number:2 |g day:25 |g month:06 |g pages:120-129 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjspcare-2018-001499 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 9 |j 2019 |e 2 |b 25 |c 06 |h 120-129 |