Improved anchoring nails : design and analysis of resistance ability : Tensile test and finite element analysis (FEA) of improved anchoring nails used in temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disc anchor
BACKGROUND: Anchorage is one of the most important treatments for severe temporomandibular joint disorder (TMD). Anchoring nails have shown great success in clinical trials; however, they can break under pressure and are difficult to remove. In this study, we aimed to evaluate an improved anchoring nail and its mechanical stability.
METHODS: The experiment consisted of two parts: a tensile test and finite element analysis (FEA). First, traditional and improved anchoring nails were implanted into the condylar cortical bone and their tensile strength was measured using a tension meter. Second, a three-dimensional finite element model of the condyles with implants was established and FEA was performed with forces from three different directions.
RESULTS: The FEA results showed that the total force of the traditional and improved anchoring nails is 48.2 N and 200 N, respectively. The mean (±s.d.) maximum tensile strength of the traditional anchoring nail with a 3-0 suture was 27.53 ± 5.47 N. For the improved anchoring nail with a 3-0 suture it was 25.89 ± 2.64 N and with a 2-0 suture it was above 50 N. The tensile strengths of the traditional and improved anchoring nails with a 3-0 suture was significantly different (P = 0.033-< 0.05). Furthermore, the difference between the traditional anchoring nail with a 3-0 suture and the improved anchoring nail with a 2-0 suture was also significantly different (P = 0.000-< 0.01).
CONCLUSION: The improved anchoring nail, especially when combined with a 2-0 suture, showed better resistance ability compared with the traditional anchoring nail.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2018 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2018 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:18 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
BMC oral health - 18(2018), 1 vom: 25. Aug., Seite 150 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Zhou, Z H [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Anchoring nail |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 09.09.2019 Date Revised 09.09.2019 published: Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1186/s12903-018-0606-3 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM287829332 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM287829332 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231225054923.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231225s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1186/s12903-018-0606-3 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n0959.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM287829332 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)30144810 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Zhou, Z H |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Improved anchoring nails |b design and analysis of resistance ability : Tensile test and finite element analysis (FEA) of improved anchoring nails used in temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disc anchor |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2018 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 09.09.2019 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 09.09.2019 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a BACKGROUND: Anchorage is one of the most important treatments for severe temporomandibular joint disorder (TMD). Anchoring nails have shown great success in clinical trials; however, they can break under pressure and are difficult to remove. In this study, we aimed to evaluate an improved anchoring nail and its mechanical stability | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: The experiment consisted of two parts: a tensile test and finite element analysis (FEA). First, traditional and improved anchoring nails were implanted into the condylar cortical bone and their tensile strength was measured using a tension meter. Second, a three-dimensional finite element model of the condyles with implants was established and FEA was performed with forces from three different directions | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: The FEA results showed that the total force of the traditional and improved anchoring nails is 48.2 N and 200 N, respectively. The mean (±s.d.) maximum tensile strength of the traditional anchoring nail with a 3-0 suture was 27.53 ± 5.47 N. For the improved anchoring nail with a 3-0 suture it was 25.89 ± 2.64 N and with a 2-0 suture it was above 50 N. The tensile strengths of the traditional and improved anchoring nails with a 3-0 suture was significantly different (P = 0.033-< 0.05). Furthermore, the difference between the traditional anchoring nail with a 3-0 suture and the improved anchoring nail with a 2-0 suture was also significantly different (P = 0.000-< 0.01) | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSION: The improved anchoring nail, especially when combined with a 2-0 suture, showed better resistance ability compared with the traditional anchoring nail | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Anchoring nail | |
| 650 | 4 | |a FEA | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Finite element analysis | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Mandibular condyle | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Suture | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Temporalmandibular joint disc anchorage | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Tensile test | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Titanium |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a D1JT611TNE |2 NLM | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Chen, X Z |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Chen, X W |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wang, Y X |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Zhang, S Y |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sun, S F |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Zhen, J Z |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t BMC oral health |d 2001 |g 18(2018), 1 vom: 25. Aug., Seite 150 |w (DE-627)NLM116714018 |x 1472-6831 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:18 |g year:2018 |g number:1 |g day:25 |g month:08 |g pages:150 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-018-0606-3 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 18 |j 2018 |e 1 |b 25 |c 08 |h 150 | ||