"Aging, Geroscience, and Freedom"
In this article, I argue that senescence (biological aging) is one of the greatest threats to human freedom in the 21st century. The two most prominent conceptions of freedom are "negative" and "positive" liberty. The negative conception of liberty equates freedom with the absence of interference, whereas the positive conception equates freedom with having the capacity to be self-determining. By critically examining both the negative and positive conceptions of liberty, I make the case that senescence does violate our liberty, on both accounts of freedom. Also, if this is correct, then the development of an applied gerontological intervention ought to be considered an integral commitment of a society dedicated to freedom. An aging intervention holds great emancipatory potential for the world's aging populations.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2019 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2019 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:22 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Rejuvenation research - 22(2019), 2 vom: 01. Apr., Seite 163-170 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Farrelly, Colin [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 15.11.2019 Date Revised 15.11.2019 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1089/rej.2018.2106 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM28762773X |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM28762773X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231225054434.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231225s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1089/rej.2018.2106 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n0958.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM28762773X | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)30124112 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Farrelly, Colin |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a "Aging, Geroscience, and Freedom" |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2019 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 15.11.2019 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 15.11.2019 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a In this article, I argue that senescence (biological aging) is one of the greatest threats to human freedom in the 21st century. The two most prominent conceptions of freedom are "negative" and "positive" liberty. The negative conception of liberty equates freedom with the absence of interference, whereas the positive conception equates freedom with having the capacity to be self-determining. By critically examining both the negative and positive conceptions of liberty, I make the case that senescence does violate our liberty, on both accounts of freedom. Also, if this is correct, then the development of an applied gerontological intervention ought to be considered an integral commitment of a society dedicated to freedom. An aging intervention holds great emancipatory potential for the world's aging populations | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a aging | |
| 650 | 4 | |a freedom | |
| 650 | 4 | |a geroscience | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Rejuvenation research |d 2004 |g 22(2019), 2 vom: 01. Apr., Seite 163-170 |w (DE-627)NLM149397488 |x 1557-8577 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:22 |g year:2019 |g number:2 |g day:01 |g month:04 |g pages:163-170 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/rej.2018.2106 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 22 |j 2019 |e 2 |b 01 |c 04 |h 163-170 | ||